> "As I mentioned earlier": where?
> Otherwise this description will be of
> little relevance in 5 years from now in our history.
I explained the motivation on the first revision of the patch
On Wed, May 7, 2025, 14:58 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Elisha,
>
Maybe an assert is really more appropriate, but technically doing so on
actual hardware should run flawlessly so I think the emu should work too...
Maybe I'm wrong though
On Tue, May 6, 2025, 19:48 Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 07:41:32PM +0300, Elisha Holland
> As I mentioned earlier, let's say you don't initialize the vertical
display end registers, and set the minimum scanline register, the emulation
will then have to allocate some display buffer, but because the vertical
display end is initilized as 0 the buffer will be empty and the program
break.
l P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 07:17:25PM +0300, Elisha Hollander wrote:
> > Sorry for former patch something is messed up with my email.
>
> The commit message needs to explain what problem is being solved by
> making this change as allowing 0 bytes looks dubious o
Sorry for former patch something is messed up with my email.
Signed-off-by: donno2048
---
util/memfd.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util/memfd.c b/util/memfd.c
index 8a2e906..e96e5af 100644
--- a/util/memfd.c
+++ b/util/memfd.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @
Signed-off-by: donno2048
---
util/memfd.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util/memfd.c b/util/memfd.c
index 8a2e906..e96e5af 100644
--- a/util/memfd.c
+++ b/util/memfd.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ err:
void *qemu_memfd_alloc(const char *name, size_t size,
arc-André Lureau
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 9:03 PM Elisha Hollander
> wrote:
> >
> > Not necessarily fdopen, can't remember why I chose it, we just need any
> pointer as no data will be written into the buffer anyways
> >
>
> NULL should be ac
Not necessarily fdopen, can't remember why I chose it, we just need any
pointer as no data will be written into the buffer anyways
On Mon, May 5, 2025, 19:55 Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 8:21 PM donno2048
> wrote:
> >
> > This silently fixes issues resulting from tr
ping
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025, 18:20 donno2048 wrote:
> This silently fixes issues resulting from trying to allocate 0 bytes.
>
> Fixes error, for example, for writing byte 0x20 to port 0x3c0, then word
> 0xf09 to port 0x3b4 when CPU is initiated, which shouldn't break.
>
> Signed-off-by: donno2048
👍
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 13:06 Alex Bennée wrote:
> Elisha Hollander writes:
>
> > weird...
>
> Richard has posted some patches:
>
> Message-ID: <20240910212351.977753-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:23:49 -0700
> Subjec
{
"emoji": "👍",
"version": 1
}
weird...
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024, 14:13 Alex Bennée wrote:
> Alex Bennée writes:
>
> > Elisha Hollander writes:
> >
> >> Sure!
> >>
> >> `build/qemu-system-i386 -plugin build/contrib/plugins/libips.so,ips=1
> -display curses -bios bios.raw`
>
Sure!
`build/qemu-system-i386 -plugin build/contrib/plugins/libips.so,ips=1
-display curses -bios bios.raw`
Also, I just tested with 9.1.0-rc4 and it resulted with
`tcg.c:3167:remove_label_use: code should not be reached`
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024, 16:08 Alex Bennée wrote:
> Elisha Hollan
But for qemu_plugin_update_ns
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024, 15:38 Elisha Hollander
wrote:
> Just checked with 9.0.2 it it still gives the error...
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 14:05 Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> Elisha Hollander writes:
>>
>> > Although it gives `undefined sy
Just checked with 9.0.2 it it still gives the error...
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024, 14:05 Alex Bennée wrote:
> Elisha Hollander writes:
>
> > Although it gives `undefined symbol: qemu_plugin_scoreboard_free`. But
> > probably I messed something up...
>
> Are you using an older
Although it gives `undefined symbol: qemu_plugin_scoreboard_free`. But
probably I messed something up...
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 14:59 Elisha Hollander
wrote:
> Oh nice, I didn't know that
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 12:39 Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>> Elisha Hollander writes
Oh nice, I didn't know that
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, 12:39 Alex Bennée wrote:
> Elisha Hollander writes:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Elisha Hollander
>
> What is the use-case for this patch?
>
> If you are simply looking to slow the emulated system down please
Just wanted to ping the patch
<https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240816162044.5764-1-just4now666...@gmail.com/>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, 19:21 Elisha Hollander
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Elisha Hollander
> ---
> accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c | 4 +---
> accel/tcg/icount-common.c |
Signed-off-by: Elisha Hollander
---
accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c | 4 +---
accel/tcg/icount-common.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
index 8163295f34..4c2baf8ed4 100644
--- a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
+++ b/accel/tcg
19 matches
Mail list logo
