Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG semantics

2017-02-06 Thread Ed Robbins
On 6 February 2017 10:39:11 GMT+00:00, Peter Maydell wrote: >On 6 February 2017 at 10:14, Ed Robbins wrote: >> It seems pretty good. I was surprised that call instructions can >> have arguments/return specified, and wonder if those are normally >> just empty, so that em

Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG semantics

2017-02-06 Thread Ed Robbins
On 3 February 2017 14:46:15 GMT+00:00, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:09:02PM +, E.Robbins wrote: >> I having been looking for prior work on a formalised semantics for >the TCG language. I have seen passing references, and wondered if >anyone can provide any pointers? >>