El 10/6/2015 7:45, "Peter Maydell" escribió:
>
> On 10 June 2015 at 10:58, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 May 2015, at 22:16, Martin Galvan <
martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> ... I think Peter M is the maintainer for Target-ARM.
> >>
> >> Peter, is this OK to commi
sequent syscalls are solved by qemu rather than gdb.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gutson
---
gdbstub.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
index 91c5f68..92bb36d 100644
--- a/gdbstub.c
+++ b/gdbstub.c
@@ -1848,6 +1848,7 @@ static int gdb_handle_
ly setting gdb_syscall_mode appropriately in the 'detach'
packet handling, so subsequent syscalls are solved by qemu rather than gdb.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gutson
---
gdbstub.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c
index 91c5f68..92bb36d 10
riately in the 'detach'
packet handling, so subsequent syscalls are solved by qemu rather than gdb.
I tested this manually.
Please commit it for me if accepted, since I don't have write privileges.
Thanks!
Daniel.
2010-02-22 Daniel Gutson
* gdbstub.c
Hi,
friendly reminder about this patch.
Thanks,
Daniel.
Daniel Gutson wrote:
Any update on this?
Thanks,
Daniel.
Daniel Gutson wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch fixes a bug that caused some NEON shift
operations to shift a wrong amount of bytes.
The problem was that a
