On 11/30/2011 04:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose that we discuss guest agent convergence in our next
KVM call. I've CC'd folks from oVirt and libvirt to join the discussion.
I think we should probably attempt to have some structure to the
discussion. I would suggest:
1. A
On 11/17/2011 06:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:46:37AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
I have been following this thread pretty closely and the one sentence
summary of the current
On Thursday 17 November 2011 21:58:03 Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 10:34 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 November 2011 02:48:50 Michael Roth wrote:
> >> I've tried to summarize the pros/cons, points, and proposals outlined in
> >> t
e you gave all the coding of the seaquence of login
needs to be done on the management system and needs to first check what OS it
is and only than execute the relevant code (which is much harder for error
handling in that situation), while when using a well defined interface all you
need to do is call the "Login()" API.
I agree that from development point of view the flexible approach of "I can do
anything in the guest" is much more appiling, I don't think this is the case
for enterprise virtualization system that needs to manage thousands of VMs
with different OS types
Thanks
Barak Azulay
On Thursday 17 November 2011 02:48:50 Michael Roth wrote:
> I've tried to summarize the pros/cons, points, and proposals outlined in
> this thread at the following wiki:
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Guest_agent_proposals
>
> Please feel free to add/edit as needed. If you don't have an account on
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:28:16 Michael Roth wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 06:13 AM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 A
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 10:16:57 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 08:05, Barak Azulay wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
> >>> But practically-speaking, it&#x
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 02:42:30 Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 00:01, Michael Roth wrote:
> > But practically-speaking, it's unavoidable that qemu-specific management
> > tooling will need to communicate with qemu (via QMP/libqmp/HMP/etc, or
> > by proxy via libvirt). It's through
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 21:45:42 Perry Myers wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 01:08 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
> > On 11/15/2011 01:01 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2011 12:24 PM, Barak Azulay wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> One of the bre
ll.
git @ git://gerrit.ovirt.org/ovirt-guest-agent
Thoughts ?
Thanks
Barak Azulay
[1] http://www.ovirt.org/news-and-events/workshop
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/File:Ovirt-guest-agent.odp
[3] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Ovirt_guest_agent
10 matches
Mail list logo
