Leonardo E. Reiter wrote:
No it's not! In fact, in the latest version, he explicitly gives it a
commercial ("Proprietary") license.
I actually submitted this as a patch to him through this list ;^)
I admit since I am a vendor, I have certain biases against forcing all
software to be GPL. H
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:20:54 +0200, "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabrice is the owner of the KQEMU code, and he decides for his own
> reasons to put the code under closed source license.
I'm sure that Fabrice knows and that I'm beating a dead horse, but this is
(strictly speakin
