On 2020-12-07 4:48 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 00:47:13 -0800
Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-12-06 10:31 p.m., Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-12-04 9:09 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
Adds bit #4 to status/control field of CPU hotplug MMIO interface.
New bit will be used OSPM to mark
On 2020-12-06 10:31 p.m., Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-12-04 9:09 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
Adds bit #4 to status/control field of CPU hotplug MMIO interface.
New bit will be used OSPM to mark CPUs as pending for removal by firmware,
when it calls _EJ0 method on CPU device node. Later on, when
On 2020-12-04 9:09 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
Adds bit #4 to status/control field of CPU hotplug MMIO interface.
New bit will be used OSPM to mark CPUs as pending for removal by firmware,
when it calls _EJ0 method on CPU device node. Later on, when firmware
sees this bit set, it will perform CPU
On 2020-12-06 10:20 p.m., Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-12-04 9:09 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
if firmware and QEMU negotiated CPU hotunplug support, generate
_EJ0 method so that it will mark CPU for removal by firmware and
pass control to it by triggering SMI.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
On 2020-12-04 9:09 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
if firmware and QEMU negotiated CPU hotunplug support, generate
_EJ0 method so that it will mark CPU for removal by firmware and
pass control to it by triggering SMI.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
---
include/hw/acpi/cpu.h | 1 +
hw/acpi/cpu.c
On 2020-11-30 8:58 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/28/20 00:48, Ankur Arora wrote:
It is possible that there are CPUs with bits for both is_inserting and
is_removing. In that case QemuCpuhpCollectApicIds() would put them in the
PluggedApicIds array and the unplug eventually happens in the next
On 2020-11-27 7:19 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/27/20 05:10, Ankur Arora wrote:
Yeah I was wondering what would happen for simultaneous hot add and remove.
I guess we would always do remove first and then the add, unless we hit
the break due to max_cpus_per_pass and switch to hot-add mode
On 2020-11-27 3:47 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:10:59 -0800
Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-11-26 12:38 p.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:17:27 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/24/20 13:25, Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware negotiates
On 2020-11-27 7:02 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/27/20 12:33, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:35:30 -0800
Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-11-26 4:46 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/26/20 11:24, Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-11-24 4:25 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware
On 2020-11-26 12:38 p.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:17:27 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/24/20 13:25, Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware negotiates ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT feature,
OSPM on CPU eject will set bit #4 in CPU hotplug block for to be
ejected CPU to mark
On 2020-11-26 11:50 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:46:32 +0100
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/26/20 11:24, Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-11-24 4:25 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware negotiates ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT feature,
OSPM on CPU eject will set bit #4 in
On 2020-11-26 4:46 a.m., Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 11/26/20 11:24, Ankur Arora wrote:
On 2020-11-24 4:25 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware negotiates ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT feature,
OSPM on CPU eject will set bit #4 in CPU hotplug block for to be
ejected CPU to mark it for removal
On 2020-11-24 4:25 a.m., Igor Mammedov wrote:
If firmware negotiates ICH9_LPC_SMI_F_CPU_HOT_UNPLUG_BIT feature,
OSPM on CPU eject will set bit #4 in CPU hotplug block for to be
ejected CPU to mark it for removal by firmware and trigger SMI
upcall to let firmware do actual eject.
Signed-off-by: I
13 matches
Mail list logo
