hmem itself. QEMU 2.1 through 2.4.1 have worked well for our use-case.
>> Why is this a single device model?
>
> No idea, but I agree it would make sense to have two different devices.
FWIW, I support splitting the device into memdev and doorbell varieties
as long as a compatibility device is available too.
Thanks,
--
Andrew James
elem->out_sg[i].iov_len,
>0, elem->out_sg[i].iov_len);
> +}
> +
> +void virtqueue_fill(VirtQueue *vq, const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> +unsigned int len, unsigned int idx)
> +{
> +trace_virtqueue_fill(vq, elem, len, idx);
> +
> +virtqueue_unmap_sg(vq, elem, len);
>
> idx = (idx + vring_used_idx(vq)) % vq->vring.num;
>
>
Thanks,
--
Andrew James
elem->out_sg[i].iov_len,
>0, elem->out_sg[i].iov_len);
> +}
> +
> +void virtqueue_fill(VirtQueue *vq, const VirtQueueElement *elem,
> +unsigned int len, unsigned int idx)
> +{
> +trace_virtqueue_fill(vq, elem, len, idx);
> +
> +virtqueue_unmap_sg(vq, elem, len);
>
> idx = (idx + vring_used_idx(vq)) % vq->vring.num;
>
>
Thanks,
--
Andrew James
