Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] virtagent: host/guest RPC communication agent

2010-10-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/25/2010 11:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 10/25/2010 05:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 10/22/2010 08:45 PM, Michael Roth wrote: This set of patches is meant to be applied on top of the Virtproxy v1 patchset. OVERVIEW: There are a wide range of use cases motivating the need for a

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] virtagent: host/guest RPC communication agent

2010-10-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/25/2010 07:06 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On 10/25/2010 05:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 10/22/2010 08:45 PM, Michael Roth wrote: This set of patches is meant to be applied on top of the Virtproxy v1 patchset. OVERVIEW: There are a wide range of use cases motivating the need for a guest

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] virtagent: host/guest RPC communication agent

2010-10-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/22/2010 08:45 PM, Michael Roth wrote: This set of patches is meant to be applied on top of the Virtproxy v1 patchset. OVERVIEW: There are a wide range of use cases motivating the need for a guest agent of some sort to extend the functionality/usability/control offered by QEMU. Some examp

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] virtagent: host/guest RPC communication agent

2010-10-25 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/23/2010 04:41 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On 10/23/2010 06:31 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 10/22/2010 08:45 PM, Michael Roth wrote: the ability to deploy to guests which may not support virtio-serial, which currently rules Matahari out. Possibly there has been some miscommunication

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] virtagent: host/guest RPC communication agent

2010-10-23 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/22/2010 08:45 PM, Michael Roth wrote: This set of patches is meant to be applied on top of the Virtproxy v1 patchset. OVERVIEW: There are a wide range of use cases motivating the need for a guest agent of some sort to extend the functionality/usability/control offered by QEMU. Some exam

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19

2010-10-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/21/2010 06:25 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: Hi Andrew, On 10/21/2010 10:43 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: In that case we've done a bad job of the wiki. Windows and other distributions are a key part of the Matahari vision. Matahari is two things - an architecture, and - an implementati

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19

2010-10-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/21/2010 03:32 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 10/21/2010 08:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:09:44AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: Hi Andrew, On 10/21/2010 05:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Hello from the Matahari tech-lead... Is there any documentation on the

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19

2010-10-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/20/2010 02:16 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 10/20/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 19.10.2010, at 17:14, Chris Wright wrote: Guest Agent - have one coming RSN (poke Anthony for details) Would there be a chance to have a single agent for everyone, so that we actually form a Qemu agent i