Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-net-pci possible limitation on AArch64

2017-07-24 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
libvirt-e4489f63-34a3-47f7-88c6-f6fb60a2aac0 libvirt-e4489f63-34a3-47f7-88c6-f6fb60a2aac0 +113:+115 +113:+115 > -Original Message- > From: Alexand

Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-net-pci possible limitation on AArch64

2017-07-24 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, Andrew, Thank you for looking at this. Comments inline. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Jones [mailto:drjo...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:02 PM > To: Alexandru Avadanii > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; svc-armband > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virti

[Qemu-devel] virtio-net-pci possible limitation on AArch64

2017-07-21 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, I ran into an interesting limitation (or possibly bug) while trying to attach more than 3 (three) virtio-net-pci NICs to an AArch64 guest. I created 4 network with virsh (see below for xml defitions) - nothing fancy, only 2 of them use NAT. Attaching a virtio-net-pci NIC for each network wor

Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-31 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Max Reitz [mailto:mre...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 8:57 PM > To: Ciprian Barbu; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Eric Blake; Alexandru Avadanii > Cc: Jeff Cody; Markus Armbruster; svc-armband; Kevin Wolf > Subject: Re: [Qemu-de

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9] rbd: Fix regression in legacy key/values containing escaped :

2017-03-31 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Tested-by: Alexandru Avadanii Thank you very much for the quick fix! > -Original Message- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 6:28 PM > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org; jc...@redhat.com; arm...@redhat.c

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
c7cacb3e7a2e9fdf929c993b98268e4179147cbb is the first bad commit block/rbd: parse all options via bdrv_parse_filename > -Original Message- > From: Alexandru Avadanii > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 3:52 AM > To: 'Eric Blake'; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: svc-a

Re: [Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, Eric, Thank you for looking into this! > -Original Message- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:ebl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 3:40 AM > To: Alexandru Avadanii; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: svc-armband; Jeff Cody; Markus Armbruster > Subject: Re: [Qemu-de

[Qemu-devel] rbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs

2017-03-30 Thread Alexandru Avadanii
Hi, While testing out 2.9.0-rc2 on AArch64, we noticed a possible regression in QEMU, related to parsing -drive 'file=rbd/...': > "conf option 6789 has no value". Instance logs [1]. Occasionally, we get "conf option too long", with the same effect. We bisected this manually between 2.8.0 (workin