Re: FIXED: Re: [Qemu-devel] possible regression in qemu-kvm 0.13.0 (memtest)

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > > Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven: > >> >> Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven wrote: If I start a VM with the following parameters qemu-kvm-0.13.0 -m 204

Re: [Qemu-devel] possible regression in qemu-kvm 0.13.0 (memtest)

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: > this was the outcome of my bisect session: > > 956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a is first bad commit > commit 956a3e6bb7386de48b642d4fee11f7f86a2fcf9a > Author: Blue Swirl > Date:   Sat May 22 07:59:01 2010 + > >    Compile pckbd o

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] ppc: Fix PReP emulation

On Sunday 19 December 2010 09:34:24 Alexander Graf wrote: > On 19.12.2010, at 16:04, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 19.12.2010 um 10:54 schrieb Alexander Graf: > >> On 14.12.2010, at 01:49, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Based on an earlier attempt of mine to make OpenBIOS work with -

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] ppc: Fix PReP emulation

On Monday 20 December 2010 03:04:38 Alexander Graf wrote: > On 19.12.2010, at 20:12, Andreas Färber wrote: > > Am 19.12.2010 um 16:34 schrieb Alexander Graf: > >> On 19.12.2010, at 16:04, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>> Am 19.12.2010 um 10:54 schrieb Alexander Graf: > On 14.12.2010, at 01:49, Andr

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] ppc: Fix PReP emulation

On Sunday 19 December 2010 09:04:00 Andreas Färber wrote: > For OpenBIOS to work, we need fw_cfg in ppc_prep.c and, independently, > patches to OpenBIOS. Unless of course we want to use another firmware > like OFW from the start. The main interest in PReP nowadays will be > proprietary firmware any

Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI 4/4] prep: Quickfix for ioport

Am 27.12.2010 um 01:11 schrieb Alexander Graf: Am 27.12.2010 um 00:28 schrieb Andreas Färber : Am 14.12.2010 um 01:49 schrieb Andreas Färber: Workaround the following error: qemu: hardware error: register_ioport_read: invalid opaque I found out that this is a conflict with i8042 registe

Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI 4/4] prep: Quickfix for ioport

Am 27.12.2010 um 00:28 schrieb Andreas Färber : > Am 14.12.2010 um 01:49 schrieb Andreas Färber: > >> Workaround the following error: >> >> qemu: hardware error: register_ioport_read: invalid opaque > > I found out that this is a conflict with i8042 registering I/O port 0x0092 in > pckbd.c, t

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ioport: Improve error output

When failing due to conflicting I/O port registrations, include the offending I/O port address in the message. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber --- ioport.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c index aa4188a..349915f 100644 --- a/ioport.c +

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU forks survey

Am 26.12.2010 um 23:19 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Färber > wrote: Am 22.12.2010 um 08:47 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Färber > wrote: Since Christmas and the New Year with its good intensions are approaching, apa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI 4/4] prep: Quickfix for ioport

Am 14.12.2010 um 01:49 schrieb Andreas Färber: Workaround the following error: qemu: hardware error: register_ioport_read: invalid opaque I found out that this is a conflict with i8042 registering I/O port 0x0092 in pckbd.c, too. Not sure what the proper fix should look like - add some qdev

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU forks survey

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 22.12.2010 um 08:47 schrieb Bastien ROUCARIES: > >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Färber >> wrote: >>> >>> Since Christmas and the New Year with its good intensions are >>> approaching, >>> apart from z80 there's some more fea

FIXED: Re: [Qemu-devel] possible regression in qemu-kvm 0.13.0 (memtest)

Am 25.12.2010 um 20:02 schrieb Peter Lieven: > > Am 23.12.2010 um 03:42 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Peter Lieven wrote: >>> If I start a VM with the following parameters >>> qemu-kvm-0.13.0 -m 2048 -smp 2 -monitor tcp:0:4014,server,nowait -vnc :14 >>> -name

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MIPS interrupts and -icount

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:22:14PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:12:39PM +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > > Hi, I don't see this problem with the qemu.org test images and neither > > >

[Qemu-devel] Fashion Challenge

 Hi Visit my site http://shilpasbeautyworld.com An exclusive coverage on various topics related to fashion, beauty, makeup, Skin care, hair care and many more topics. Do visit, its really interesting. Accept the fashion Challenge now !!! Regards …. Re

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 09:16:28PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > >> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> >> 2010/12/24 Mic

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : >> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> 2010/12/24 Michael S. Tsirkin : >> >> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:59:58AM +0900, Yoshiak

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:57:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> 2010/12/24 Michael S. Tsirkin : > >> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:59:58AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> >> 2010/12/16 Mic

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> 2010/12/24 Michael S. Tsirkin : >> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:59:58AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> 2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin : >> >> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:28:46PM +0900, Yoshiak

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > 2010/12/24 Michael S. Tsirkin : > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:59:58AM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> 2010/12/16 Michael S. Tsirkin : > >> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:28:46PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> >> 2010/12/16 Mic

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:14:44PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : >> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> >> If qemu_aio_flush() is responsible for flushing the outstanding >> >> >> virtio-net re

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 07:14:44PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > 2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> >> If qemu_aio_flush() is responsible for flushing the outstanding > >> >> virtio-net requests, I'm wondering why it's a probl

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

2010/12/26 Michael S. Tsirkin : > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: >> >> If qemu_aio_flush() is responsible for flushing the outstanding >> >> virtio-net requests, I'm wondering why it's a problem for Kemari. >> >> As I described in the previous message, Kemari queue

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/21] virtio: modify save/load handler to handle inuse varialble.

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:42:19PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> If qemu_aio_flush() is responsible for flushing the outstanding > >> virtio-net requests, I'm wondering why it's a problem for Kemari. > >> As I described in the previous message, Kemari queues the > >> requests first.  So in you

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MIPS interrupts and -icount

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:22:14PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:12:39PM +0100, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > Hi, I don't see this problem with the qemu.org test images and neither > > with my boards/images. I see QEMU basically not running at all when > > the gu