Hi,
Thank you for your response.
(2009/12/26 4:51), Andreas Färber wrote:
..snip
/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-ppc -m 1024 -hdc fc6-ppc-1.img -boot c
Have you tried -hda fc6-ppc-1.img -boot c? -hdc (secondary master) is
> probably less tested with OpenBIOS.
I have not only tried -hdc but also
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Most of the patches I commit without posting them first to the list are
> to fix bugs on non i386 targets, as they are broken too often by people
> who don't care about them.
>
> I don't like leaving the tree broken too long so I prefer to f
On 12/27/2009 04:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
It's not about maintainers, but people sending patches. Maintainers
can't review all the patches in small details. People writing patches,
should think about the impact it can have on linux-user or non-i386
system target,
Better documentation is
There are ~35 patches committed each working day. That's a lot of
unnecessary traffic to qemu-devel IMHO.
It's only unnecessary if you don't consider that people might
review patches. When I see "thanks applied" I know e.g. it's not
waiting for review. Or if it is wrong I will comment with prio
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:38:14PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/27/2009 05:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
>> are committed to the shared tree.
>> 1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
>> to the list first,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:23:26PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:34:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > I'd like to dis
On 12/27/2009 05:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
are committed to the shared tree.
1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
to the list first, thus they go in without review.
Why is this good? Can this be addressed?
Ian Molton wrote:
Can I get the status of this patchset please ?
Thanks!
> This patch rationalises the declaration of inet_listen_opts such that
> it matches the other inet_{listen,connect}_opts functions.
>
> This change is needed for a patch adding socket reconection support.
>
> Signe
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Am 27.12.2009 um 12:06 schrieb Stefan Weil :
>
> >Alexander Graf schrieb:
> >>For what I know DCR is always 32 bits wide, so we should also use
> >>uint32_t to
> >>pass it along the stacks.
> >>
> >>This fixes a warning when comp
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:34:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
> > > are committed to the sh
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 09:34:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
> > are committed to the shared tree.
> > 1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
> >
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:37:32PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
> are committed to the shared tree.
> 1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
>to the list first, thus they go in without review.
>Why is this good?
Am 27.12.2009 um 12:06 schrieb Stefan Weil :
Alexander Graf schrieb:
For what I know DCR is always 32 bits wide, so we should also use
uint32_t to
pass it along the stacks.
This fixes a warning when compiling qemu-system-ppc64 with KVM
enabled, making
it compile without --disable-werror
Sign
Am 27.12.2009 um 17:12 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
wrote:
2. When a change is committed to the tree, often no notification is
sent
to the author.
Why is it a good idea to ask everyone to subscribe to qemu commits
list as well? Can 'applied
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 07:48:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:45:10PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:12:37PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:45:10PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:12:37PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'd like to discuss two questions
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:12:37PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
>> > are committed to the shared tree.
>> > 1. A l
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 04:12:37PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
> > are committed to the shared tree.
> > 1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
> > to the list
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Blue Swirl wrote:
I've applied the patch that implements tcg_unsigned_cond, please try again.
Looks good - builds on OpenSolaris/SPARC again.
Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
> are committed to the shared tree.
> 1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
> to the list first, thus they go in without review.
> Why is this good? Can this
On Dec 27, 2009 5:40 AM, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
are committed to the shared tree.
1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
to the list first, thus they go in without review.
Why is this good? Can this be addressed?
2
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
> 2. When a change is committed to the tree, often no notification is sent
> to the author.
> Why is it a good idea to ask everyone to subscribe to qemu commits
> list as well? Can 'applied thanks' mail be sent to patch author
I'd like to discuss two questions related to changes that
are committed to the shared tree.
1. A lot of patches are committed without being posted
to the list first, thus they go in without review.
Why is this good? Can this be addressed?
2. When a change is committed to the tree, often no no
Alexander Graf schrieb:
> For what I know DCR is always 32 bits wide, so we should also use
> uint32_t to
> pass it along the stacks.
>
> This fixes a warning when compiling qemu-system-ppc64 with KVM
> enabled, making
> it compile without --disable-werror
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
> ---
>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Palle Lyckegaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Building on OpenSolaris/SPARC fails with:
>
> ...
> LINK mips64-softmmu/qemu-system-mips64
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> tcg_unsigned_cond li
25 matches
Mail list logo
