Hey Folks!
this might sched some light on the x86_64 issues
reported over and over again ...
(maybe it's already fixed but I haven't tried yet)
[ 78.890508] mount[39]: segfault at cffc rip f7f8d210 rsp
8100d000 error 6
[ 224.745093] sh[24]: segfault at fff
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:06:07 +0300
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01 Apr 2006, at 22:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > and they have been an extensive user of software patents,
>
> And how:
>http://www.patent.gov.uk/patent/legal/summaries/2004/o29204.htm
>
> "The invention in this c
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:36:17AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Here is what I have tested on i386 with kqemu. I also tried
> > -kernel-kqemu with a few linux 2.6 guests but only got panics, one
> > screenshot of KANOTIX-2006-CeBIT-
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Here is what I have tested on i386 with kqemu. I also tried
> -kernel-kqemu with a few linux 2.6 guests but only got panics, one
> screenshot of KANOTIX-2006-CeBIT-RC3.iso is at
> http://www.mytempdir.com/562050 (all panics looked lik
k;
-+}
-+#if __FreeBSD_version < 50
- destroy_dev(kqemu_dev);
-+ if ((rc = cdevsw_remove(&kqemu_cdevsw)))
-+ kqemu_log("error unregistering, rc=%d\n", rc);
-+#else
-+ EVENTHANDLER_DEREGISTER(dev_clone, clonetag);
-+ while ((ks = TAILQ_FIRST(&a
On 01 Apr 2006, at 22:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
and they have been an extensive user of software patents,
And how:
http://www.patent.gov.uk/patent/legal/summaries/2004/o29204.htm
"The invention in this case involves locating all of the input
registers in one data storage area, and all of t
Hi all,
I wanted to test some application on Linux-PPC using Valgrind (don't ask me
why :-) ) so I downloaded the PPC image one can find on FreeOSZoo (the
Debian Sarge one) and compiled Valgrind on it.
When I want to run it, it fails with a nice error message. When asked on the
Valgrind list what
Hi all,
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 18:00 +0200, Wolfgang Schildbach wrote:
> I find it strange that ARM would restrict emulation of their architecture
> -- that could hardly pose a threat to their business, I would say.
Unfortunately, I don't. ARM probably makes quite a lot of money from
their devel
The module logs "QEMU Accelerator Module version 1.2.0, Copyright (c)
2005 Fabrice Bellard" while we are in 2006.
Major bug ! :-)
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Hi,
the attached patch adds DESTDIR at the right places in the makefile,
which is suitable for packaging (build with --prefix=/usr, install
with make install DESTDIR=/foo, then you have the resulting tree in
/foo/usr/...)
patrick mauritz
#
#
# patch "Makefile"
# from [24ce1c8e1082fb804f509f5f
10 matches
Mail list logo
