Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Compilation errors on BSD

2006-01-06 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Oh well, :-p The funny thing is I didn't have the Ports availiable at the moment because I was just about to upgrade my outdated FreeBSD installation to 6.0 and I was going to use QEMU for this purpose. I have to agree about that the CVS and the release tarball from the website should also have th

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Compilation errors on BSD

2006-01-06 Thread André Braga
On 1/7/06, andrzej zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hiyas, > Today I tried compiling QEMU on a FreeBSD computer and it spitted at > me a bunch of errors, all of them being results of trivial differences > in system headers. The following patch fixed them and I got a working > QEMU 0.8.0, in

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Compilation errors on BSD

2006-01-06 Thread andrzej zaborowski
Hiyas, Today I tried compiling QEMU on a FreeBSD computer and it spitted at me a bunch of errors, all of them being results of trivial differences in system headers. The following patch fixed them and I got a working QEMU 0.8.0, in case anyone's interested. There was also another trivial change nee

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-devel Digest, Vol 34, Issue 8

2006-01-06 Thread Flavio Visentin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > First of all, if you complain about this, then do !NOT! quote the whole ... > Second of all, if you don't like long emails, do !NOT! set the digest ... > Third of all, this is a *DEVEL* list. Things discussed on this list are 4th of all, writing

Re: [Qemu-devel] Hosting of your website

2006-01-06 Thread Paul Brook
On Friday 06 January 2006 14:19, Nahuel ANGELINETTI wrote: > Hi, > > We just view you're hosted by free.fr the french ISP, and think you're > project must have a good hosting, also we propose you to host the qemu > website on our server for free. > We are not a company, we are only french individua

Re: [Qemu-devel] PCI access virtualization

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Williamson
> What about 64-bit systems that use an IOMMU? Don't they already have a > 64-bit physical -> 32-bit IO address space mapping? I don't know if this > mapping is per-bus or system global. If it's an Intel x86_64 machine (no IOMMU yet), IIRC the 32-bit PCI devices are capable of DMA-ing into the bo

[Qemu-devel] Hosting of your website

2006-01-06 Thread Nahuel ANGELINETTI
Hi, We just view you're hosted by free.fr the french ISP, and think you're project must have a good hosting, also we propose you to host the qemu website on our server for free. We are not a company, we are only french individual people who think Open Source must have more community hosting, and u

Re: [Qemu-devel] PCI access virtualization

2006-01-06 Thread Paul Brook
> > IIUC PCI cards don't really have "DMA engines" as such. The PCI bridge > > just maps PCI address space onto physical memory. A Busmaster PCI device > > can then make arbitrary acceses whenever it wants. I expect the default > > mapping is a 1:1 mapping of the first 4G of physical ram. > > I was

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-devel Digest, Vol 34, Issue 8

2006-01-06 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Josè Gerardo Gonzàlez Jimènez wrote: > Hi, i'm new on this list... bus i have a suggestion, is not ease read > mails with 100 lines of code... why don't put it in a webpage/blog, and only > paste an URL to see it?? that may make more clean to read this mails... First of

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.8.0, windows 2000 and windows update

2006-01-06 Thread NAKATA Maho
In Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le jeudi 05 janvier 2006 à 10:12 +0900, NAKATA Maho a écrit : > > Hello list, > > > > I cannot do windows update inside of Windows 2000 SP4, vanilla > > qemu 0.8.0. Whenever I do windows update, I recived > > web serv

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu-devel Digest, Vol 34, Issue 8

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:24 -0700, Josè Gerardo Gonzàlez Jimènez wrote: > Hi, i'm new on this list... bus i have a suggestion, is not ease > read mails with 100 lines of code... It would be easier for you if you'd switch away from digest mode. That way you would get every single mail as su