Hi,
> >
> Hi,
> I have the exact same problem here on linux (mdk 9.2) even if I use the
> localtime option
> last time I used 'date' to set the proper date and it has not been
> stored onywhere.
> I thought it has some nvram file or something (i'm emulating a prep system)
>
Nice to hear that I
designer replicas
http://upgrade.nrik.com/rep/dir/
A good scare is worth more to a man than good advice.
When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth.
The cautious seldom err.
Just to be is a blessing. Just to live is holy.
Religion is pickled God.
To trav
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:11:41PM -0400, John Coiner wrote:
>
> >>I had to download and install Win2k SP4, then Win2k SP4 "Hotfixes," and
> >>also an IE6 upgrade, before windows update ran.
> >
> >Are you running with a tun/tap device, or -user-net ? I'm still unable
> >to get windowsupdate to w
Here are two new patches, which attempt to fix the QEMU build for the
dependency on pthreads introduced by nonblocking IO. They are on the
nonblocking IO page:
http://people.brandeis.edu/~jcoiner/qemu_idedma/qemu_dma_patch.html#install
The first is a quick fix to the QEMU's 'configure' scrip
Helmut Auer a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When starting a linux client under Win2K I got a wrong date from the
system.
Sometimes its nearly ok, the next time its 2 months ago ...
Any idea what can cause this behaviour or how to avoid it ?
Bye
Helmut
Hi,
Can anyone give me a hin
Brad Campbell wrote:
With this patch qemu will not boot the qcow files but will boot the base
images (I copy them and then try to boot to test). As soon as I patch -R
&& make, qemu will boot the qcow files no problems..
Let me clarify that..
qemu-img create -f qcow xp.img 4G
qemu -cdrom xp.i
Hi,
I found some answers/help to my questions by further looking:
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 15:41 +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
> Hi,
> First of all, this is more a question about qemu usage, not development,
> but the link to the qemu user forum on the qemu website
> ( http://www.dad-answers.com/qemu-
I had to download and install Win2k SP4, then Win2k SP4 "Hotfixes," and
also an IE6 upgrade, before windows update ran.
Are you running with a tun/tap device, or -user-net ? I'm still unable
to get windowsupdate to work. Getting it to work in vmware seems to work
on the first try.
I've been
Hi, it looks like I stirred up some change by asking about tun and tap.
(and definately it's important to know that "tun" is a tap device!)
In case anyone's interested, here is a tapdev2.c that I put together
to make use of two virtual nics as tap devices. Maybe also the script
setup will interest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When starting a linux client under Win2K I got a wrong date from the system.
Sometimes its nearly ok, the next time its 2 months ago ...
Any idea what can cause this behaviour or how to avoid it ?
Bye
Helmut
Hi,
Can anyone give me a hint which module is responsibl
John Coiner wrote:
Non-blocking disk IO now works for any type of disk image, not just
"raw" format. There is no longer any format-specific code in the patch:
http://people.brandeis.edu/~jcoiner/qemu_idedma/qemu_dma_patch.html
You might want this patch if:
* you run a multitasking guest OS,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:16:18PM -0400, John Coiner wrote:
>
>
> Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >I am also haveing trouble getting a fresh win2k install under qemu to
> >actually
> >be able to run windows update.
>
> I had to download and install Win2k SP4, then Win2k SP4 "Hotfixes," and
> also a
Hi,
First of all, this is more a question about qemu usage, not development,
but the link to the qemu user forum on the qemu website
( http://www.dad-answers.com/qemu-forum/index.php )is broken (404), and
I don't see any other place to get qemu help for users. If there is a
better place for this qu
Then all is good and I should not use (2) as a benchmark.
Thanks for clarifying :)
On 10/4/05, John Coiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) is a parallel task -- 'tar' and 'bunzip2' run concurrently. You see
> a benefit here when one process can use the CPU while the other is
> blocked waiting for
Christian MICHON wrote:
hmmm
the static binary crashes, the one with ptreadGC2.dll is ok.
What I tried to measure, on windows host, kqemu-0.7.2
loaded, was:
(1) tar -jxf linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2
(2) make allnoconfig; make
I confirm ~18% speed improvement in case (1), but no change
more or le
$B!Z$40';"![!'(B
$B!!Ev%5!<%/%k$O!"6bA,E*$K7C$^$l$F$$$k1|[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B%5%]!<%H%0%k!<[EMAIL PROTECTED])$5$l!"uITK~(B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<%H$9$kL\E*$K3hF0$r$7$F$*$j$^$9!#(B
$B!!:#2s!"Jg=8$5$;[EMAIL PROTECTED]/$N$O$3$N$h$&[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B!!$3$NEY
On Tue, Oct 04 2005, Christian MICHON wrote:
> hmmm
>
> the static binary crashes, the one with ptreadGC2.dll is ok.
>
> What I tried to measure, on windows host, kqemu-0.7.2
> loaded, was:
> (1) tar -jxf linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2
> (2) make allnoconfig; make
>
> I confirm ~18% speed improvement
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> do you happen to have vde for win32 ?
> If yes, please point it to me, because I've googled for one with no
> luck... :)
>
Porting VDE to windows is fairly easy.
The hard part is getting qemu to work with it. Unlike POSIX OSes,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:23:26AM +0200, Matteo wrote:
> That would be a very good idea. I've always thought of installing vde or
> any other application to make a network of VMs painfull.
Well, i find that a qemu_switch would be more convient as you could set up
the network at boot time (like i
hmmm
the static binary crashes, the one with ptreadGC2.dll is ok.
What I tried to measure, on windows host, kqemu-0.7.2
loaded, was:
(1) tar -jxf linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2
(2) make allnoconfig; make
I confirm ~18% speed improvement in case (1), but no change
more or less for case (2). I believe m
indeed, this was a quick and dirty hack :)
I just managed to compile pthreadGC2 statically...
pthread.h has to be modified to include extra
PTW32_STATIC_LIB info, like this:
#define PTW32_VERSION 2,6,0,0
#define PTW32_VERSION_STRING "2, 6, 0, 0\0"
#define PTW32_STATIC_LIB 1
I'll test it later tod
I took my copy of the Xen-DemoCD.2.[whatever] I've got, made an iso image of
it, booted it in qemu.
So far Dom0 has booted, debian GNU/Linux 2.6.x DomU is booting, as is the
NetBSD domU - I'm not sure that the FreeBSD DomU is going to do anything. it
is rather cramped though - I've only got 51
Le lundi 03 octobre 2005 à 20:29 +0200, Fabrice Bellard a écrit :
> Another point is that I am very tempted to integrate a feature to
> connect several qemu without needing an external program such as VDE. I
> am thinking of it because it would be relatively easy to add to the
> existing user-ne
Thanks for the info.
#ifdef WIN32
void usleep(unsigned long usec)
{
Sleep(usec/1000);
}
#endif
The division "usec/1000" is an expensive operation on any processor.
Maybe it would be better just to use "_sleep(1)" which is analogous to
usleep(1000) ?
This is what i did to have it comp
Christian MICHON a écrit :
no vde for windows hosts :(
Have you tryed ? Because the VDE code don't interract to mutch with the
system (only require POSIX OS) and contains a lot of "win32" test as you
can see in the attachement. But there is no document how to compile
that. Since there are "w
do you happen to have vde for win32 ?
If yes, please point it to me, because I've googled for one with no
luck... :)
On 10/3/05, Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Christian MICHON wrote:
>
> > I think you meant "guests" instead of "hosts".
> > I second that. I would
I did not manage a static link on win32 yesterday. I needed the
pthread dll in the same directory as qemu.exe.
I'll look more into it.
On 10/4/05, John Coiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose that on Windows, we tell people to unpack the pthread
> distribution within the qemu tree. Qemu's con
Whoops. I had the mistaken belief that Qemu already used pthreads.
So, the makefiles and configure script need to handle pthreads somehow
(especially on windows.) Pthreads-w32 is refusing to 'make install'
itself into standard lib and include directories. Unlike SDL, there is
no 'pthread-conf
no vde for windows hosts :(
On 10/3/05, Jean-Christian de Rivaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian MICHON a écrit :
> > to do so, does that mean we would need to launch a 1st qemu
> > instance which would contain the dhcp server, and next qemu
> > instances would connect to it ?
> >
> > if so,
29 matches
Mail list logo
