Mike Swanson wrote:
I'm just wondering... is it any trouble to draw QEMU using Xlib?
I'd prefer that over any conventional toolkit. There are many
instances where I'm not running any GTK or QT applications on my
desktop, and I'd appreaciate it if I didn't have load either of them
only to run QE
Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:33:26PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
What's more, it seems like the easiest way, given the
way QEMU currently works, to have an advanced GUI that can manage
multiple instances of QEMU (using tabs or something like that).
I'm working o
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:37:39PM -0700, Mike Swanson wrote:
> I'm just wondering... is it any trouble to draw QEMU using Xlib?
>
No. Somone released a file called nosdl.c which did that, though it was for a
really
old version of qemu it may still work. (The way it was written was sort of a
hac
http://free-deai.1192296.net/
おいらのモットーと言えば、即ハメ・即H!
だって、出来るだけたくさんの子としたいし、
可愛い娘を見つけたら即行ハメたいと思うのはオイラだけ?
できれば、メールの駆け引きとか面倒なことはしたくないよね?
http://free-deai.1192296.net/
今回のターゲットはこの子デース!
名前:まき
年齢:22歳
まきちゃんは現在、某ファーストフード店でアルバイト中。
http://free-deai.1192296.net/
拒否はこちら。
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
___
I'm just wondering... is it any trouble to draw QEMU using Xlib?
I'd prefer that over any conventional toolkit. There are many
instances where I'm not running any GTK or QT applications on my
desktop, and I'd appreaciate it if I didn't have load either of them
only to run QEMU. >_>
--
Mike
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 07:33:26PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What's more, it seems like the easiest way, given the
> way QEMU currently works, to have an advanced GUI that can manage
> multiple instances of QEMU (using tabs or something like that).
>
I'm working on something like that (th
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:55:14PM -0400, Karl Magdsick wrote:
> > (SDL is more-or-less considered obsolete in general, iiuc Fabrice wants the
> > windows port of qemu to use the Win32API natively to handle graphics, while
> > on *nix systems an X toolkit (such as Qt or GTK) is preferred.)
>
> Out
Karl Magdsick wrote:
(SDL is more-or-less considered obsolete in general, iiuc Fabrice wants the
windows port of qemu to use the Win32API natively to handle graphics, while
on *nix systems an X toolkit (such as Qt or GTK) is preferred.)
Out of curiosity, has GTK on Win32 been considered?
> (SDL is more-or-less considered obsolete in general, iiuc Fabrice wants the
> windows port of qemu to use the Win32API natively to handle graphics, while
> on *nix systems an X toolkit (such as Qt or GTK) is preferred.)
Out of curiosity, has GTK on Win32 been considered?
-Karl
__
Paul Brook wrote:
On Monday 12 September 2005 22:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Without knowing the differences in kqemu between versions, it's hard to
narrow down any further. I looked at the diffs for qemu though and did
not see anything obvious.
kqemu is a proprierary module only availa
On Monday 12 September 2005 22:37, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Admittedly this is probably not a standard usage, but I'm using qemu for
> Xen development (Xen is an Open Source hypervisor). It works quite well
> so far.
>
> 0.7.2 seems to have broken support for kqemu. Linux freezes during boot
> (r
Admittedly this is probably not a standard usage, but I'm using qemu for
Xen development (Xen is an Open Source hypervisor). It works quite well
so far.
0.7.2 seems to have broken support for kqemu. Linux freezes during boot
(running in ring 1 under Xen) right before launching the INIT proce
Hi.
Are there any plans to emulate a serial mouse inside quemu (perhaps with a
-mouse-serial option)? I think this could be useful for some old dos programs
that can't use a serial mouse.
By the way, has anyone experienced bug #9396?:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=
Monday, September 12, 2005 5:00 AM Mad Monkey wrote:
2/ Attached are the resyncs against 0.7.2 release for :
- the TAP device support
(http://www.h6.dion.ne.jp/~kazuw/qemu-win/qemu-0.7.1-tap.zip)
- the PIIX4 BusMaster ATA (UltraDMA/33) support
(http://ebisa.hp.infoseek.co.jp/qemu/arcs/qemu-pii
Ooopps... Little mistake here...
SiSoft Sandra reports ONLY a 400% gain.(5 times faster is indeed a 400%
gain !)
A few details about my config :
- Host and VMs are XP SP2.
- IDE controller for the unpatched VM reports "Mode PIO"
- IDE controller for the patched VM reports "Ultra DMA Mode 2"
-
15 matches
Mail list logo