He has been wa
nd this?
tching you struggle these last seven years. Understa
ssee it.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
why isn't it possible to use some Sun-provided flash PROM-Update binary for
SS5 or so?
Now that would be interesting. Running it could reveal some bugs in Qemu's
HW implementation and especially where we have made some bogus shortcuts.
For example, the boot sequence is not what a real Prom e
He has been watching
these last seven years. Understand this?
you struggle
seee it.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Hi,
If bugs in V9 emulation were fixed, there could be some chances of
booting recent Sparc64 kernels. Also a working prom with real
OpenFirmware support is needed and that does not exist yet.
why isn't it possible to use some Sun-provided flash PROM-Update binary
for SS5 or so?
> It's
Nardmann, Heiko wrote:
how far is support for SPARC Solaris as a guest operating system inside qemu?
Latest public PROLL stuff has still the following problems:
From: "Blue Swirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:42:56 +0200
Here's a translation
Hi,
Short answer: does not work yet.
Long answer: based on the recent tests, I'd say the problem is more in the
Openprom implementation rather than Sparc v8 CPU or hardware emulation. It's
much harder to know what are the problems when working with closed source.
If you want to help, I'd sug
Nardmann, Heiko wrote:
how far is support for SPARC Solaris as a guest operating system inside qemu?
I have read something about PROLL but did not understand what it is for or or
how to use it. Can anyone shed some light onto it?
A pity that you made me angry a while ago.
Otherwise I coul
Hi,
how far is support for SPARC Solaris as a guest operating system inside qemu?
I have read something about PROLL but did not understand what it is for or or
how to use it. Can anyone shed some light onto it?
--
Heiko Nardmann
___
Qemu-devel mail
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:40 +0200, Stefan Kombrink wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
> Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
> Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
>
Hi there,
I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
pay 89$ for it?
greetings,
Stefan K. >8^)
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
