On 8/2/05, Juergen Lock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:30:47PM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
> > On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 7/30/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On
Hello Hetz, Ozan...
> Add: clock=pit
> to the fedora core GRUB kernel boot parameters .
I have tried itstill feel slower than RH 9I've tried
HPET=disable too with no luck. I'll try to investigate this issue
deeper but still welcome everyone's ideas
To Ozan: i use -m 256. do I need
Blue Swirl wrote:
Hi,
Looks like the boot block gets loaded correctly (nice data point). It's
a bit confusing to see UFS in the error message, shouldn't that be ISOFS
or CDFS?
I'm not sure if this is relevant, but the line "Kernel loaded" surely the size
should be somewhat larger than 0K?
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:30:47PM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote:
> On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/30/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 7/30/05, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Ok
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 22:42 +0200, Rudi Lippert wrote:
> So I packed all my C knowledge into a little test program, and here it is:
>
> int main(int argc, char* argv) {
> SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_EVERYTHING);
> SDL_SetVideoMode(640, 480, 0, SDL_ANYFORMAT);
> SDL_Quit();
> }
>
> Without SetVideoMod
Hi,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Rudi Lippert wrote:
> So I packed all my C knowledge into a little test program, and here it is:
>
> int main(int argc, char* argv) {
> SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_EVERYTHING);
> SDL_SetVideoMode(640, 480, 0, SDL_ANYFORMAT);
You could try to use specific bit depths, i.e. instea
well, just to let you know ... I'm interested in the emulator
(is there some howto available, regarding openprom and such?)
http://www.openfirmware.org/
I've learned most things by reading the sources (Proll, Linux
arch/sparc/prom, silo). Luckily, the code base is not large.
A nice way of ge
So I packed all my C knowledge into a little test program, and here it is:
int main(int argc, char* argv) {
SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_EVERYTHING);
SDL_SetVideoMode(640, 480, 0, SDL_ANYFORMAT);
SDL_Quit();
}
Without SetVideoMode, it will terminate correctly. With SetVideoMode, it
needs to be kill9ed
Hi,
Looks like the boot block gets loaded correctly (nice data point). It's a
bit confusing to see UFS in the error message, shouldn't that be ISOFS or
CDFS?
You could try debugging that further by making a new Proll image with
DEBUG_OBP enabled in openprom.c file.
I'm now in the middle of
Hi there,
I'm using qemu-0.7.1 to install SUSE Linux enterprise v9 and everything
proceeds smoothly until the boot loader as to be installed as which point I get
the SUSE installer reporting a "segmentation fault while installing GRUB".
The hard disk image is in raw format I created using qemu-i
On Monday 01 August 2005 18:27, J.N. Herder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having some troubles with QEMU's hard disk images and may have bumped
> into a bug. I'm trying to import data into my emulated MINIX, but somehow
> it is truncated.
>
> I successfully created a qemu-img called hda.img of 512 MB an
Hi all,
I'm having some troubles with QEMU's hard disk images and may have bumped
into a bug. I'm trying to import data into my emulated MINIX, but somehow
it is truncated.
I successfully created a qemu-img called hda.img of 512 MB and installed
the latest version from MINIX on it. Trying to
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Paul Brook wrote:
> The gcc4 changes are a different matter. I discusses this with Fabrice on
> IRC
> shortly after submitting the patch. The patch is pretty invasive, high risk,
> and potentially hard to debug and maintain.
Talking of which, I don't know if I have sent y
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 00:37 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Rudi Lippert wrote:
>
> > Looks like there really is an SDL problem. I'm not capable of writing a test
> > program, but I tried sdlroids. It hangs in status S+ right after starting
> > it.
> > After I fou
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sparc V8 system emulator is very much complete, but in practice some hidden
> bugs in it (and also bugs in Proll's Openprom support) make the emulator
> fragile. It can only run Linux 2.6 series, 2.4 or BSDs won't run. Probabl
On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/30/05, Mars G. Miro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 7/30/05, Jung-uk Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Okay. I finally found a fix. It was actually quite simple. Newer
> > >
Trying to install Solaris 8 SPARC into qemu (tarball 0.71) in a 2.6.11
system.
---snip---
linux:/data/qemu # uname -a
Linux linux 2.6.11.4-21.7-default #1 Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC 2005 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
---snip---
Issuing the following command
---snip---
linux:/data/qemu # qemu-system-sp
Ellis, Mike wrote:
Hi there...
This is probably already in the works, but just in case it hadn't been reported yet, I think the
latest versions of "windows qemu" and "windows kqemu" may be out of sync.
Using qemu 0.7.1-3 from:
http://qemu.dad-answers.com/download/win32/
and the latest kq
18 matches
Mail list logo
