On 7/26/05, Pascal Terjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Darryl Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi All, Fabrice,
> >
> > Compiling the new kqemu-0.7.1 on Fedora Core 4 with kernel
> > 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 gives this error:
> >
> > -8<---
> > [EMAIL PROTEC
On 7/26/05, Darryl Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All, Fabrice,
>
> Compiling the new kqemu-0.7.1 on Fedora Core 4 with kernel
> 2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 gives this error:
>
> -8<---
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] kqemu]$ make
> make -C /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4/build M=
On 7/24/05, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> QEMU version 0.7.1 is out.
>
> More info at http://bellard.org/qemu
>
> Fabrice.
Outstanding work! I've been a fan of QEMU as a free emulator for some time.
The changelog mentions that the KQEMU accelerator is now available as
a
Hi All, Fabrice,
Compiling the new kqemu-0.7.1 on Fedora Core 4 with kernel
2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 gives this error:
-8<---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kqemu]$ make
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4/build M=`pwd` modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.12-1
Hi,
I tried to compile the new version of kqemu (0.7.1) and got a strange
message. The system is a brand-new Suse 9.3 install running kernel
2.6.11.4 (smp). Here's the bit that failed (qemu starting directory
is /home/tachyon/qemu/qcvs/qemu-0.7.1):
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tachyon/qem
I am currently running windows version of Qemu. I can
get
the dsl.iso to boot into xwindows but once it boots i
can't move the mouse to get into anything ie...
xterm...
My OS is WinXP PRO and i'm emulating damn small linux.
Am I missing something?
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:00:42 +0200
Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> QEMU version 0.7.1 is out.
Wow. Absolutely perfect. :) All my AMD64 issues with regard to networking
are now fixed...
I must say, Qemu is a shining example of Open-Source software... It works
very well, is h
On Monday 25 July 2005 04:45 pm, Juergen Lock wrote:
> I just sent a request for help with the new kqemu to the
> FreeBSD lists, maybe I should have Cc'd this one:
Updated the patch here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507251825.51540.jkim
Thanks,
Jung-uk Kim
_
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:21:47AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Here is what I have learned so far w.r.t. freebsd. Hope this
> helps people running qemu+freebsd.
>
> Qemu versions: qemu-0.7.0s.20050717 & qemu-0.7.1 [1] + kqemu
> Host: freebsd-5.x freebsd-6, freebsd-7-current [2]
> Processors: P4, A
host:
Linux laptok 2.6.12-gentoo-r6 #1 Fri Jul 22 10:21:50 CEST 2005 x86_64
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
guest:
Windows XP Home Edition, Service Pack 2 + all updates
qemu:
0.7.1: i386-softmmu, x86_64-softmmu, x86_64-softmmu + kqemu
problem:
Everything works with i3
Here is what I have learned so far w.r.t. freebsd. Hope this
helps people running qemu+freebsd.
Qemu versions: qemu-0.7.0s.20050717 & qemu-0.7.1 [1] + kqemu
Host: freebsd-5.x freebsd-6, freebsd-7-current [2]
Processors: P4, AthlonXP, P4 HT[3]
VMs[4]: freebsd-4.x, freebsd-5.x, dragonfly (latest)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:21PM +0200, Andreas Bollhalder wrote:
> Hello
>
> What does I need to change in the source code of QEMU that it would be
> possible to enable write access to the ROM adresses from 0xC800 up to
> 0xEFFF ? For instance, "UMBPCI.SYS"
> (http://www.uwe-sieber.de/umbpci_e.
I'm in the middle of replacing a hard drive for my hosted server (yes,
the data is safe ;)) and I'll mirror QEMU download within the next few
days.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 7/25/05, Wesley Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know how often I attempt to download the latest QEMU, only to battle
> th
I don't know how often I attempt to download the latest QEMU, only to battle
the link being constantly broken, resulting in needing to resume again and
again and again ...
I think QEMU should be mirrored, since it's obviously too popular for the link
it's currently on.
--
Clinersterton beademu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, feel free to put your results in the unofficial OS support
list http://www.claunia.com/qemu/
El 25/07/2005, a las 7:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello,
For a couple of days ago, i have successfully tested FreeBSD (just the
kernel boo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tested with -win2k-hack option?
El 25/07/2005, a las 8:43, GOLVELLIUS escribió:
hi ...
I have tried all versions of the latest qemu 0.7 and CVS versions with
the same results ... Windows 2000 starts but freezes on the logo
booting screen ... Syste
hi ...
I have tried all versions of the latest qemu 0.7 and CVS versions with
the same results ... Windows 2000 starts but freezes on the logo
booting screen ... System is not block , you can see movement on the
blue animation bar , but windows 2000 no boots ...
I have been able to access to the b
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 19:14 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Interesting! What's the performance of x86 on ARM? I would guess something
> like 386/16-25MHz? Also are you running on stock nslu2 or have you done
> un-underclocking and now running on 266MHz?
Yes, this an un-underclocked nslu2. I have
18 matches
Mail list logo