Adrian Smarzewski wrote:
> bash-2.05b$ uname -a
> Linux localhost 2.6.11-gentoo-r7 #1 Sun May 8 06:59:56 CEST 2005 x86_64
> AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
>
> bash-2.05b$ qemu -hda win_xp_home_sp2.raw -user-net -localtime
>
> Qemu 0.7.0 without any patches.
localhost ro
Ben Taylor wrote:
> suspect the amd64 is biting you. What is your host OS
> environment like, and what version of qemu are you
> compiling?
bash-2.05b$ uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.11-gentoo-r7 #1 Sun May 8 06:59:56 CEST 2005 x86_64
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
bash-2.
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:55, Sebastian Kaliszewski wrote:
> So the idea was indeed stupid :)
>
> On Monday 09 May 2005 02:40, Paul Brook wrote:
> > No. The main problem with gcc3.4 was that we weren't using FORCE_RET
> > everywhere that we should. This has mostly been fixed now.
>
> I see...
>
> [s
So the idea was indeed stupid :)
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:40, Paul Brook wrote:
> No. The main problem with gcc3.4 was that we weren't using FORCE_RET
> everywhere that we should. This has mostly been fixed now.
I see...
[snip]
>
> I've got a solution for x86/x86-64 that's 95% complete, using th
The attached patch fixes some trivial build problems with newer gcc on amd64.
It adds FORCE_RET on load ops, and introduces helper functions for floating
point negation (these require a literal constant load).
Paul
Index: target-i386/op.c
==
Hi,
Here are patch for serial port support(partial; linux host only). You
can
invoke it by adding sth like "-serial /dev/ttyS0" in arguments to let qemu
using host's serial port as its serial port. qemu will change host's serial
port setting(baudrate, databits, stopbits, parity) when g
Adrian Smarzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> Ben Taylor wrote:
> >>From: Adrian Smarzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: 2005/05/08 Sun PM 06:22:27 EDT
> >>To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> >>Subject: [Qemu-devel] user networking - win xp quest, amd64 linux host
> >>
> >>When I set 10.0.2.15 for win
On Monday 09 May 2005 01:02, Sebastian Kaliszewski wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As I understand the problem with dyngen & GCC 3.4 and newer is that even
> when using the following marcro (line 158 of dynget-exec.h) in op_*
> functions
>
> #define FORCE_RET() asm volatile ("");
>
> GCC still puts multiple ex
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Should work..
how can I debug it? Any logs for user-networking? qemu 0.7.0.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Alternatively,
volatile
inc ax
dec ax
inc ax
dec ax
which is the same size as 4 nops (on x86 assembly), has a net result
of doing nothing (caveat interrupts/preemption), and is *absolutely
illogical* to find in any machine-generated code...
There must be some way to generate similar co
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Adrian Smarzewski wrote:
DHCP is not working just like I wrote. I set DNS and default gateway
using QEMU manual for user-networking. No success.
Should work..
Does user-mode networking need routing enabled in host kernel?
No.
Regards
Henrik
__
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
it's ok with me on a XP host and running linux 2.6.10 with either
-kernel option (remember you need an -hda too) and inside an iso.
It also works inside a -fda too.
What is your exact cmd line ?
qemu -nographic \
-hda linux.img \
-kernel bz
Ben Taylor wrote:
>>From: Adrian Smarzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: 2005/05/08 Sun PM 06:22:27 EDT
>>To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>>Subject: [Qemu-devel] user networking - win xp quest, amd64 linux host
>>
>>When I set 10.0.2.15 for win xp guest I can ping 10.0.2.2
>>but DHCP doesn't work and rout
Hello!
As I understand the problem with dyngen & GCC 3.4 and newer is that even
when using the following marcro (line 158 of dynget-exec.h) in op_*
functions
#define FORCE_RET() asm volatile ("");
GCC still puts multiple exit points of a function.
But did anyone try the following one:
#defin
On Sunday 08 May 2005 21:36, Marc Collin wrote:
> hi
>
> i do:
> modprobe kqemu
>
> with /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
> kqemu 43272 0
>
> does kqemu run corretely?
> l'm not suppose to get 2?
Yes you are if :
* one instance of qemu is running
* this instance was started after kqe
Le 8 Mai 2005 18:40, Struan Bartlett a écrit :
> Marc Collin wrote:
> >Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> >>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
> >
> >0 means kqemu is ok?
>
> I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of
> QEM
>
> From: Adrian Smarzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/05/08 Sun PM 06:22:27 EDT
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] user networking - win xp quest, amd64 linux host
>
> When I set 10.0.2.15 for win xp guest I can ping 10.0.2.2
> but DHCP doesn't work and routing too. Any i
On Sun May 8 2005 5:40 pm, Struan Bartlett wrote:
> When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu 43428 0
The zero represents the number of processes currently using the module. You
will also get zero if no instance of Qemu is currently running.
-jm
_
When I set 10.0.2.15 for win xp guest I can ping 10.0.2.2
but DHCP doesn't work and routing too. Any ideas?
Something in host-kernel configuration?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Marc Collin wrote:
Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
0 means kqemu is ok?
I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of
QEMU, lsmod lists:
kqemu 43428 2
When I r
for me it's working on a XP host with qemu 0.7.0.
I can see the ouput errors on the serial console of qemu. Neat :)
I just miss a initrd...
I've been compiling 2.6.x guests since qemu 0.6.0, and the only pb
I have are regarding stable framebuffer switching. It works on the host
but not always insi
Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
>
0 means kqemu is ok?
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/lis
Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
2005/5/8, Marc Collin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi
>
> i do:
> modprobe kqemu
>
> with /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
> kqemu 43272 0
>
> does kqemu run corretely?
> l'm not suppose to get 2?
>
> thanks
>
hi
i do:
modprobe kqemu
with /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
kqemu 43272 0
does kqemu run corretely?
l'm not suppose to get 2?
thanks
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mail
hi
somebody know when the problem (protection error) to use kqemu with qemu and
win9x will be removed?
thanks
--
www.laboiteaprog.com
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:24:57AM +0200, Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
> >
> > Hi !
> >
> > does anybody have a 2.6.X (preferably 2.6.10) running under qemu ?
> > trying to launch it (passed with -kernel) fails - it simply gives me
>
> works fine here with and without graphical output
> for using
Is it better (faster) to emulate x86_64 or x86 architecture on
amd64 host with 32-bit Windows as guest?
Will kqemu for amd64 change something in this case?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 07:24, Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > does anybody have a 2.6.X (preferably 2.6.10) running under qemu ?
> > trying to launch it (passed with -kernel) fails - it simply gives me
> >
> > (qemu)
>
> You need to make sure you have the sdl development headers and li
> it's ok with me on a XP host and running linux 2.6.10 with either
> -kernel option (remember you need an -hda too) and inside an iso.
>
> It also works inside a -fda too.
>
> What is your exact cmd line ?
>
qemu -nographic \
-hda linux.img \
-kernel bzImage \
-append "
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:24:57AM +0200, Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> does anybody have a 2.6.X (preferably 2.6.10) running under qemu ?
> trying to launch it (passed with -kernel) fails - it simply gives me
works fine here with and without graphical output
for using qemu-fast x86/x86
On Sunday 08 May 2005 07:24, Der Herr Hofrat wrote:
> Hi !
>
> does anybody have a 2.6.X (preferably 2.6.10) running under qemu ?
> trying to launch it (passed with -kernel) fails - it simply gives me
>
> (qemu)
You need to make sure you have the sdl development headers and libraries
installed
it's ok with me on a XP host and running linux 2.6.10 with either
-kernel option (remember you need an -hda too) and inside an iso.
It also works inside a -fda too.
What is your exact cmd line ?
Christian
On 5/8/05, Der Herr Hofrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> does anybody have a
Hi !
does anybody have a 2.6.X (preferably 2.6.10) running under qemu ?
trying to launch it (passed with -kernel) fails - it simply gives me
(qemu)
thats it - the 2.6.10 is compiled as generic 686 and works fine on the box
thx !
Nicholas Mc Guire e-mail: [EM
33 matches
Mail list logo