Hi all,
as we now happily are more than one person developing
python-mode.el, we should care to avoid parallel
writing, discuss some agenda.
>From my perspective the following is most urgent:
- adaptation to python 3.x (while maintaining backward compat)
- which-function-mode
As I'm a novice
LOL.
I haven't even looked at 3.0 yet. I have no idea what would be involved,
Andreas. Are there any changes that would cause massive alterations in
the way a person using it would want it to look and feel in emacs?
Well, after spending 15 minutes reading about the changes made in 'Py3k'
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Beverley Eyre wrote:
I haven't even looked at 3.0 yet. I have no idea what would be
involved, Andreas. Are there any changes that would cause massive
alterations in the way a person using it would want it to look and
Beverley Eyre wrote:
>
> LOL.
>
> I haven't even looked at 3.0 yet. I have no idea what would be involved,
> Andreas. Are there any changes that would cause massive alterations in
> the way a person using it would want it to look and feel in emacs?
>
>
> Well, after spending 15 minutes readin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 19, 2009, at 9:24 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Speaking of folks that move on, in the process of checking on mail
aliases for the package I noticed that a certain [email protected]
was receiving mail for supercite. Fixed (but you're alway
Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Beverley Eyre wrote:
>> LOL.
>>
>> I haven't even looked at 3.0 yet. I have no idea what would be involved,
>> Andreas. Are there any changes that would cause massive alterations in
>> the way a person using it would want it to look and feel in emacs?
>>
>> >
>> Well, af
