for the answer.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-map.html
http://www.tkdocs.com/tutorial/styles.html
In the latter you might like to note that there is a section called
"Sound Difficult to you?". It's well worth the read.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 02/04/2016 19:45, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/2/2016 11:11 AM, Mark Lawrence via Python-list wrote:
A typical call to create an Entry field would be:-
e = Entry(master, validate='all', ...)
Once this call has been made is it possible to change the validation
mode at runtime?
AF
language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
of months. For those who
disagree, they can provide the patches, or the edits to a wiki as
appropriate.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
source file,
running the risk of circular imports, feel free, I won't lose any sleep
over it, but give me one, clean file any day of the week.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.pytho
On 05/04/2016 21:35, Michael Selik wrote:
What code have you written so far?
Would you please not top post on this list, it drives me nuts!!!
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org
27;ll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem to
be frowned upon here; they are not 'Pythonic'.
How can you (plural) write Python code when you don't know Python?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our lang
er in the function
or worse provide a meaningless result.
What library designers do ?
Please see
http://ftp.dev411.com/t/python/python-list/13bhcknhan/when-to-use-assert
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Ma
of GOTO will certainly help in that area. How does it go, something
like "always consider that the person maintaining your code in six
months time is a homicidal maniac armed with an axe"?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/04/2016 15:34, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 10:25:13 AM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/04/2016 14:54, BartC wrote:
On 06/04/2016 12:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
BartC :
It'll cope with ordinary coding as well, although such programs seem
to be frowned
let alone write decent code.
Until such time as I see proof that he has any idea at all as to what
he's talking about, he stays firmly in my dream team.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mai
ssubclass(deque, Sequence)
True
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
low Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
se the two tuples almost always
twice. Once to find out if they are equal and if not a second
time to find out which is greater.
Have you read this https://wiki.python.org/moin/HowTo/Sorting ?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 08/04/2016 23:59, [email protected] wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 3:57:40 PM UTC-7, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 01/04/2016 23:44, [email protected] wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 3:10:51 PM UTC-7, Michael Okuntsov wrote:
Nevermind. for j in range(1,8) should be for j in range
what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
/wiki/Disjoint-set_data_structure
Could you post a formal solution of disjoint-set using my algorithm
You write the code, we comment on it. No code, no comment. Got the
message?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Law
on in this discussion, as we're on
the main Python mailing list? Please can the moderators take this stuff
out, it is getting beyond the pale.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/m
On 09/04/2016 20:25, Tim Golden wrote:
On 09/04/2016 20:13, Mark Lawrence via Python-list wrote:
On 09/04/2016 01:43, Ben Finney wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
Yet another completely irrelevant thread that has nothing to do with
Python. As this is meant to be the main Python mailing
, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 09/04/2016 21:22, alister wrote:
On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 20:13:15 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 09/04/2016 01:43, Ben Finney wrote:
Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
Yet another completely irrelevant thread that has nothing to do with
Python. As this is meant to be the main Python mailing list
This may be of interest to some of you
http://www.snarky.ca/network-protocols-sans-i-o
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
else default. Nothing in that docstring
suggests that the default value is evaluated even if the key exists, and I
can't think of any good reason to do so.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Mark
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I see. Perhaps counterintuitive, but implemented consistently. Add it to the
list of gotchas, I guess.
By the way... four helpful responses in under an hour, very impressive. Nice
community here. Thanks to all who answered.
Mark
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020, 11:05:10 AM PST, Serhiy
ce_state']
(There's not really any point popping the value if you're not going to
do anything with it - just delete the key from the dictionary)
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
;:
main()
```
By default, the main process won't exit until there are no non-daemon
threads still running. You can either send some sort of signal to the
threads signal the threads to exit the loop and return cleanly (you'd
also need a timeout on the queue `get()` calls). Or you can create the
threads as "daemon" threads (as in the commented-out lines), in which
case they'll be killed when all non-daemon threads have exited. Daemon
threads don't get a chance to do any cleanup, close resources, etc. when
they're killed, though, so aren't always appropriate.
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
may be that it also uses `__all__` to determine
a module's public API. In that case, setting `__all__ = ["f"]` in `A`
should prevent it from offering `math` as a completion (nor any other
name that's not in the `__all__` list).
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t expression, you'd need to
pass the generator to tuple's constructor:
tuple(word for word in list_ if word[0] == 'e')
(You don't need to include an extra set of brackets when passing a
generator a the only argument to a function).
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[email protected] wrote:
That is an excellent point, Mark. Some of the proposed variants to the
requested problem, including mine, do indeed find all instances only to return
the first. This can use additional time and space but when done, some of the
overhead is also gone. What I mean is
Stefan Ram wrote:
Mark Bourne wrote or quoted:
I don't think there's a tuple being created. If you mean:
( word for word in list_ if word[ 0 ]== 'e' )
...that's not creating a tuple. It's a generator expression, which
generates the next value each time it&#
I'm just learning Python, and I've run into trouble trying to change
directory to the windows My Documents directory. There's likely a better
way to do this, but this is what I've tried so far:
-
from tkinter import Tk
from tkinter.filedialog import as
In article ,
MRAB wrote:
> On 2015-07-10 15:27, Mark Storkamp via Python-list wrote:
> > I'm just learning Python, and I've run into trouble trying to change
> > directory to the windows My Documents directory. There's likely a better
> > way to do this
On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 9:47:10 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
> On Monday, May 1, 2017 at 11:27:01 AM UTC-7, Robert L. wrote:
> [no Python]
>
> Do you ever plan to ask any questions about Python? Or are you just using a
> few lines of code as a fig leaf for the race baiting that you post in
The ? is indeed for variable substitution, but AFAIK only for field values, not
for table names, which is why your first example doesn't work and your second
and third examples do work.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I think the problem that Deborah has encountered is a more general one on
Windows: many pip-installable packages assume that a C compiler is
available.
Now an "obvious" solution is for pip to recognise that a C compiler is
needed and give an appropriate error message. But while that may reduce
con
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 9:50:18 AM UTC+1, Michele Simionato wrote:
> Thanks. I suspected the culprit was executescript, but I did not see it
> documented in
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/sqlite3.html#connection-objects.
Although the standard library's sqlite3 module is useful, person
On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 1:47:00 PM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
> I am trying to use sqlite
>
> $ python2.7
> Python 2.7.10 (default, Feb 22 2016, 12:13:36)
> [GCC 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-16)] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>>
ge':
''}
# Terminal
$ python -m chardet FILENAME
FILENAME: MacRoman with confidence 0.7167379080370483
Thanks!
Albert-Jan
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
n2_to_mock` won't call `function1_to_mock` (or its mock)
regardless of whether `function1_to_mock` has been patched, unless you
set the mock of `function2_to_mock` to do so. You don't necessarily
need to patch `function1_to_mock`, unless of course there are other
calls to it that you need to mock.
--
Mark.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[email protected] wrote:
On 2024-12-14 at 12:08:29 +,
Mark Bourne via Python-list wrote:
Martin Ruppert wrote:
Hi,
the division 0.4/7 provides a wrong result. It should give a periodic
decimal fraction with at most six digits, but it doesn't.
Below is the comparis
Martin Ruppert wrote:
Hi,
the division 0.4/7 provides a wrong result. It should give a periodic
decimal fraction with at most six digits, but it doesn't.
Below is the comparison of the result of decimal, mpmath, dc and calc.
0.0571428571428571460292086417861615440675190516880580357142857 decim
5801 - 5842 of 5842 matches
Mail list logo
