2022-09-29, Mike Dewhirst schrieb:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
Why?
[Schnipp]
--
Jan v/d Broek
[email protected]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks very much for your detailed reply. I have a few followup questions.
You said, “Some functions return an object that has already been incref'ed
("new reference"). This occurs when it has either created a new object (the
refcount will be 1) or has returned a pointer to an existing objec
On Thursday, September 29th, 2022 at 07:18, Robert Latest via Python-list
wrote:
> Hi Chris and dh,
>
> thanks for your --as usually-- thoughtful and interesting answers. Indeed,
> when
> doing these web applications I find that there are several layers of useful,
> maybe less useful, and unk
On 2022-09-30 05:31:15 -, Jan van den Broek wrote:
> 2022-09-29, Mike Dewhirst schrieb:
> > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>
> Why?
Why not? Signing an email protects against impersonation and tampering.
While you may not be assured that my name is indeed "Peter J
On 2022-09-30 17:02, Jen Kris wrote:
Thanks very much for your detailed reply. I have a few followup
questions.
You said, “Some functions return an object that has already been
incref'ed ("new reference"). This occurs when it has either created a
new object (the refcount will be 1) or has
That's great. It clarifies things a lot for me, particularly re ref count for
new references. I would have had trouble if I didn't decref it twice.
Thanks very much once again.
Sep 30, 2022, 12:18 by [email protected]:
> On 2022-09-30 17:02, Jen Kris wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks very
On 1/10/22 8:18 am, MRAB wrote:
It's OK to INCREF them, provided that you DECREF them when you no longer
need them, and remember that if it's a "new reference" you'd need to
DECREF it twice.
Which means there would usually be no point in doing the extra
INCREF/DECREF. You still need to know wh
On 30/09/2022 3:31 pm, Jan van den Broek wrote:
2022-09-29, Mike Dewhirst schrieb:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
Why?
Good question.
Further to Peter's explanation, email is the primary conduit for
hackers. At this point in time human education and training is
