I have just installed pyfltk version 1.1.4 on my xubuntu 9.10 system,
it's working OK and a fairly trivial little program I have written is
able to pop up a GUI window.
However I'm now a bit stuck as the documentation seems a little
sparse. For example I'm using FL_Multiline_O
Andreas,
Congratulations, it's a well polished release.
For those not familiar with FLTK, there are many examples in the
Python24/pytfltk/test directory.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
y, February 22, 2006 6:14 AM
> Subject: ANN: pyFltk-1.1
>
>
>
>>This is to announce the first official release of pyFltk-1.1,
>>the Python bindings for the cross platform GUI toolkit fltk-1.1
This reminds me, whatever happened to the FLWM? It was sweet.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
{fixed top-posting}
george williams wrote:
> > This is to announce the first official release of pyFltk-1.1,
> > the Python bindings for the cross platform GUI toolkit fltk-1.1
>
> By god this sounds interesting I wish I
> knew what you are talking about
fltk (pronoun
To put it simply, if you think Tkinter is not very easy/simple/fast/...
(fill in your favourite adjective here) then you might want to try
pyFltk. It basically helps you to build simple user interfaces from
Python.
Regards
Andreas Held
http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net
--
http://mail.python.org
By god this sounds interesting I wish I
knew what you are talking about
George-- Original Message -
From: "andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python.announce
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject: ANN: pyFltk-1.1
On Mon, 6 Nov 2005, it was written:
> aum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, ... Whereas PyFLTK feels
>> more like an average suburban 4-door sedan
>
> Interesting. What would Tkinter be at that car dealership?
A '
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> Running some of the test examples
> (e.g. C:\Python24\pyfltk\test\doublebuffer.py)
> I am getting an error I have never seen before:
>
> ==
> TitleOfMessageBox:
> Microsoft Visua
> So I hope this humble message might inspire some folks to have a serious
> look at pyfltk. For many situations, PyFLTK can take you to break-even
> point quickly, and deliver net savings in time and effort after that.
Animated by your posting I have downloaded:
fltk-1.1.6-s
aum wrote:
> But for smaller gui programs not needing the power of wx, I find I get
> the job done much more quickly and effortlessly with PyFLTK.
Interesting. I've found PyQt very easy to use too. I wonder how they compare
(providing you can GPL your app, of course).
--
Jeremy S
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:10:32 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> Installing things mean, usually:
8><
Distilling what you've said, it would appear the essence of your argument
is "PyFLTK is less desirable because it's not popular", an argument
which, despite a level of pragm
Roger Binns wrote:
>
> It is possible to make the wxPython smaller by having more DLLs each with
> fewer widgets in it. That way you will only suck in the ones you use.
>
I find this VERY interesting Roger, I've been contemplating making such
a request to the maintainer of wxPython (when he ge
aum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm saying is that there are many basic projects being written for
> these toolkits, whose functionality could be completely supported by
> PyFLTK. When only a smaller set of widgets is needed, there's a stronger
> case for us
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:25:49 +0100, egbert wrote:
> PyFLTK is not a debian package - yet.
> Is nobody interested, or is there a more specific reason ?
AFAIK, the maintainer feels it's still at release-candidate stage.
When he's happy with it, I'm sure he could be persuaded
PyFLTK is not a debian package - yet.
Is nobody interested, or is there a more specific reason ?
--
Egbert Bouwman - Keizersgracht 197 II - 1016 DS Amsterdam - 020 6257991
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
e toolkits, whose functionality could be completely supported by
PyFLTK. When only a smaller set of widgets is needed, there's a stronger
case for using lighter widget libraries - especially FLTK, because you'll
get way more functionality per line of code, and finish your project
faster, than i
"aum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, with fuzzy dice hanging
> from the mirror, fridge and microwave in the back, and DVD consoles on
> every seat, towing a campervan - absolute power and luxury, giving 8mpg
> if you're l
Hi Peter,
I just used the setup.py that comes in the singlefile/gui sample.
However, py2exe does still also require the msvcr71.dll runtime as well,
which is 340kb. Here it is, it's a bit lengthy:
# If run without args, build executables, in quiet mode.
if len(sys.argv) == 1:
sys.argv.appe
Bugs wrote:
> Peter Hansen wrote:
>> The wxPython program below, py2exe'd on my machine (1.6GHz Pentium M),
>> comes to only 12MB (2-3MB of which is Python itself), and takes 1-2
>> seconds to load (actually less than one second after the first
>> invocation following a fresh reboot).
>
> And e
aum wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:31:54 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote:
>
>
>>aum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, ...
>>>Whereas PyFLTK feels more like an average suburban 4-door sedan
>>
>>I
Peter Hansen wrote:
>
> The wxPython program below, py2exe'd on my machine (1.6GHz Pentium M),
> comes to only 12MB (2-3MB of which is Python itself), and takes 1-2
> seconds to load (actually less than one second after the first
> invocation following a fresh reboot).
>
And even 12MB seems h
aum wrote:
> To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, with fuzzy dice hanging
> from the mirror, fridge and microwave in the back, and DVD consoles on
> every seat, towing a campervan - absolute power and luxury, giving 8mpg
> if you're lucky.
>
> wxPython has the cost of a massive disk and m
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:31:54 -0800, Paul Rubin wrote:
> aum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, ...
>> Whereas PyFLTK feels more like an average suburban 4-door sedan
>
> Interesting. What would Tkinter be at that car deal
aum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To me, wxPython is like a 12-cylinder Hummer, ...
> Whereas PyFLTK feels more like an average suburban 4-door sedan
Interesting. What would Tkinter be at that car dealership? What
about PyGTK?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi all,
I've been doing a fair bit of python gui programming on and off, jumping
between different widget sets along the way, from anygui, to pythoncard,
to tkinter/PMW, then to wxPython/wxGlade, and have now settled on a python
gui API that seems to get barely a mention - PyFLTK.
PyFLTK
Hello
I am very interested in the pyFLTK GUI widget set. Unfortunately the webpage
and mailing lists are very quiet, does anyone here use it or know of a
resource I can access to help me with some examples?
Cheers
JM
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
26 matches
Mail list logo
