Paul Rubin <"http://phr.cx"@NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
> "Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2. Dynamic languages naturally more lang-maven oriented?
>>See http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides
>
> Not sure what you mean by this, even after reading that (interesting)
> article. The
"Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2. Dynamic languages naturally more lang-maven oriented?
>See http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides
Not sure what you mean by this, even after reading that (interesting)
article. These days Haskell (which has static types) seems to be all
the r
Jeff Rush wrote:
> ...we need more talks that actually teach you how
> to be better programmers...What the Heck Does
> "Pythonic Programming Style" Mean Anyway?
I'm finishing an outline for a talk which will overlap this one a bit,
but under the topic "What makes a great API?" that will be directe
I've been looking over the mix of talk proposals we have so far for PyCon
2007. We're got 17 so far, with a good number of case histories. Now case
histories are good, don't get me wrong, we want Python to be successful and it
is interesting to hear how it is being used. But according to the
