Whether SWIG will work in a "no brainer" way or not depends on the original
code, I think. If the original code uses a very convoluted design, of
course things will get hairy. If the package uses a very clean structure,
I think you will find SWIG works out very nicely.
The intriguing things is,
It's me wrote:
"It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am playing around with SWING building a Python module using the no
brainer
example in http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html. With that first example,
Oops! Soapy fingers. "SWIG" - not "SWING".
--
It's me.
I hav
"It's me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am playing around with SWING building a Python module using the no
brainer
> example in http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html. With that first example,
>
Oops! Soapy fingers. "SWIG" - not "SWING".
--
It's me.
--
http:/
