Istvan Albert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > For example it resembles the icon for text files.
> >
> > This is intentional: to make it obvious that .py files are the
> > readable, editable scripts, contrasting with .pyc's binary gunk -
>
> I think this is a mistake, it does not seem obi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > For example it resembles the icon for text files.
>
> This is intentional: to make it obvious that .py files are the
> readable, editable scripts, contrasting with .pyc's binary gunk -
I think this is a mistake, it does not seem obious, all it does is just
blends in
Istvan Albert wrote:
> But these new icons are too large, too blocky and too pastel.
Hooray! Glad to see *someone* doesn't like 'em, I'll expect a few more
when b1 hits. :-)
Although I can't really see 'large', 'blocky' or 'pastel'... they're
the same size and shape as other Windows document ico