> Accepted strategy? It doesn't seem very portable. It assumes that
> everyone puts their library
> modules in the exact same place. Or do they just figure that changing
> the sys.path.append
> line is easy enough?
Portability has nothing to do with it. If you arrange your project in a way
that th
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> >> Maybe Jython expert has the perfect answer but til then.
> >>
> >> Did you try:
> >>
> >> sys.path.append('path to search')
> >>
> >> Usually this works if nothing else does.
> >>
> >> -Larry
> >
> > Thanks. That's a good workaround, but I would like to know the
> > "
Russ wrote:
> On Feb 21, 4:15 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Russ wrote:
>> > I have a Python program that I want to run in Jython so I can get Java
>> > bytecode output. The program runs fine in Python, but when I change
>> > the first line of the main program to make it run in Jyt
On Feb 21, 4:15 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russ wrote:
> > I have a Python program that I want to run in Jython so I can get Java
> > bytecode output. The program runs fine in Python, but when I change
> > the first line of the main program to make it run in Jython, it fails
> > t
Russ wrote:
> I have a Python program that I want to run in Jython so I can get Java
> bytecode output. The program runs fine in Python, but when I change
> the first line of the main program to make it run in Jython, it fails
> to find some of the imported modules. These are just plain Python
> im
