On 10/9/20 1:02 AM, Muhammad Saad wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Sent from [1]Mail for Windows 10
>
>I Want To Reinstall Python Now Which Version I Install Now
>
> References
>
>Visible links
>1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986
>
The latest, 3.9, is as always consid
Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:11:56 UTC+5:30, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> > > On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > > > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
> >
[ Ramchandra Apte wrote on Tue 11.Sep'12 at 19:58:29 -0700 ]
> On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 22:19:08 UTC+5:30, Charles Hottel wrote:
> > I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
> >
> > I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:11:56 UTC+5:30, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
>
> > On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
>
> >
>
> > > Ther
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
>
> > There is no longer an equivalent document for the Python 1.x or 2.x
>
> > series of releases.
>
>
>
>
On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
> There is no longer an equivalent document for the Python 1.x or 2.x
> series of releases.
Perhaps not for 1.x but the 2.x series is still covered:
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/
On 11/09/2012 17:49, Charles Hottel wrote:
I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as
I try to usually use several versions to know the difference. You never
know when a package might come along, and you want to try it out, and then
version becomes compatibility.
Alternatively, a client might come along and insist that a particular
version be used.
Do a little quick research on th
On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 22:19:08 UTC+5:30, Charles Hottel wrote:
> I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
>
> I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
>
> or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:11:22 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:17:14 -0700, Peter wrote:
>
>> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>>
>> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of
>> packages that have not been ported to 3.x (
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:17:14 -0700, Peter wrote:
> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>
> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of
> packages that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
But if all you want is to learn Python, t
On 2012.09.11 19:17, Peter wrote:
> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>
> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of packages
> that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
This is true, but the /potential/ for the need for one of
If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of packages
that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
Not having looked at the changes in 3.x (so don't flame me! :-)), it would seem
that anything yo
"Charles Hottel" writes:
> I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
> I want to learn Python.
Good for you, and welcome!
> Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x or Python 3.x ?
> Also why should I prefer one over the other?
This question is a go
On 11/09/2012 17:49, Charles Hottel wrote:
I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as
Having recently looked for the same answer myself, consensus seems to be
that you should work with 3.x unless you know you need something that is
still 2.x specific. For me, that 2.x specific item was OpenStack.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Charles Hottel wrote:
> I have a lot of programmin
*#How to use setup.py file with py2exe:*
**
python daniesetup.py py2exe --bundle 1
*#Also the data files have to taken care off in the options* list
*#Here is a sample setup.py:*
*#*
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
import sys
# n
> the method involves editing python26.dll in order to remove
> dependency references and then dropping msvcr90.dll in the same
> directory as the py2exe produced executable.
Clever idea Waldemar, thanks for that, but for the moment, using the
dll as a win32 assembly (ie. with a manifest file, as
Waldemar,
Thank your for sharing your technique - works great with 32-bit Python
2.6.4.
Has anyone tried this with a 64-bit version of Python?
Malcolm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 30, 10:05 am, kakarukeys wrote:
> I tried on a fresh XP on VM. I moved all dlls in C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS
> which are in the file handles shown by Process Explorer including the
> 3 CRT dlls to the my dist folder and the two subfolders suggested
> byhttp://wiki.wxpython.org/py2exe. It didn't wo
Hi all,
#use py2exe properly to create a single distributable exe
#setup.py- create a single exe that runs all boxex
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
import sys
# no arguments
if len(sys.argv) == 1:
sys.argv.append("py2exe")
# creates a standalone .exe file, no zip files
setup(
I tried on a fresh XP on VM. I moved all dlls in C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS
which are in the file handles shown by Process Explorer including the
3 CRT dlls to the my dist folder and the two subfolders suggested by
http://wiki.wxpython.org/py2exe. It didn't work out. My app couldn't
start. Windows XP gave a
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> I guess I really need an installer. Oh well.
This need not be that much of a hurdle. Several solutions exist such
as Inno Setup (my personal preference), NSIS, etc... which are not
hard to create a solid installer with. I suspect your end users will
appreciate it too
On 29/12/2009 18:31, [email protected] wrote:
Jonathan,
I'm going to try to run vcredist_x86.exe automatically (as opposed to
asking my users to download and run it manually). I don't currently
have any installer, so I'm going to run vcredist_x86.exe on my
application start-up. Some logic like
Jonathan,
I'm going to try to run vcredist_x86.exe automatically (as opposed to
asking my users to download and run it manually). I don't currently
have any installer, so I'm going to run vcredist_x86.exe on my
application start-up. Some logic like this seems to do this trick:
if platform.sy
>> However, this takes a few seconds to run. Is there a sensible way for
>> me to only run this if the required DLL is not already installed? How
>> should I be detecting that?
Look at windows\winsxs\
>> Also: Will this work on 64 bit machines? Or do I not need to worry
>> about that?
If you shi
On Dec 29, 2:24 pm, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> On Dec 27, 1:51 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Martin,
>
> > > You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
>
> > Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
>
> > 1. Can I safely place the
On Dec 27, 1:51 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
>
> Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
>
> 1. Can I safely place these 2 files in the same folder as my Py2exe
> generated EXE fi
On 27/12/2009 05:18, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Jonathan Hartley mailto:[email protected]>>
writes:
These
are non-technical users, so I'd rather send them a single executable
that 'just works',
[break]
rather than asking them to install Python and then
coach them through
> Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
Unfortunately, I can't answer these questions for py2exe. In principle,
it would hope that it is possible to include the DLLs *in* the
executable, if the py2exe mode is used where it includes all DLLs.
Regards,
Martin
--
h
Hi Martin,
> You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
1. Can I safely place these 2 files in the same folder as my Py2exe
generated EXE file or do I need to place the MSVCR90.DLL file in a
speciall
> Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
> MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
> based executable?
You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> FYI, my experience is that an entire manifest must be distributed. As
> the manifest in question actually lists 3 DLLs, IIUC, you must ship all
> 4 files - the 3 DLLs and the manifest, even if only one of the DLLs is
> actually used.
You don't actually need to include all three DLLs. Just inclu
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> These
are non-technical users, so I'd rather send them a single executable
> that 'just works',
[break]
rather than asking them to install Python and then
> coach them through running a script - they would HATE that as a
> solution.
>
Whoa... How can you go from
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> 2) About once a week the last couple of months I've had a friend phone
> to say 'can you write me a simple program to do X', where X is stuff
> like calling a web API to look up info for every postcode/zipcode in a
> database. This sort of thing is ideally suited to Pyt
On Dec 26, 3:14 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> >Am I right to infer that if I want to distribute a py2exe'd
> >application legally, and have half a chance of it working on a non-
> >developer's machine, then I have to:
>
> >a) Ask my users to run the Visual C++ redistributab
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>Am I right to infer that if I want to distribute a py2exe'd
>application legally, and have half a chance of it working on a non-
>developer's machine, then I have to:
>
>a) Ask my users to run the Visual C++ redistributable installer, as
>well as download my program. This
On Dec 21, 2:56 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> >Many thanks for that, but my issue is that my programs work fine for
> >me on my computer - but then fail on other people's computers. I'd
> >very strongly prefer for my users to not have to install the MSVCR
> >redistributable
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>Many thanks for that, but my issue is that my programs work fine for
>me on my computer - but then fail on other people's computers. I'd
>very strongly prefer for my users to not have to install the MSVCR
>redistributable installer as well as my program - it would be much
On Dec 17, 11:16 pm, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 18/12/2009 7:44 AM, Ross Ridge wrote:
>
> > The "P" DLL is for C++ and so the original poster may not actually need
> > it. I'm pretty sure Python itself doesn't need it, and py2exe shouldn't
> > either, but wxPython, or more precisely wxWidgets, almo
On Dec 17, 8:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> > Only this week I sent a py2exe-derived executable to someone else (a
> > non-developer) and it would not run on their WinXP machine ("'The
> > system cannot execute the specified program'") - my current favourite
> > hypothe
On 18/12/2009 7:44 AM, Ross Ridge wrote:
The "P" DLL is for C++ and so the original poster may not actually need
it. I'm pretty sure Python itself doesn't need it, and py2exe shouldn't
either, but wxPython, or more precisely wxWidgets, almost certainly does.
So in your case you'll probably need
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>1) I don't understand why the OP's question doesn't deserve a literal
>answer ...
I gave what I thought was a simple, direct and literal answer.
>.. isn't one of those DLLs in the WinSxS directory derived from
>his MSVC install?
I have no idea. He might not even have
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> Only this week I sent a py2exe-derived executable to someone else (a
> non-developer) and it would not run on their WinXP machine ("'The
> system cannot execute the specified program'") - my current favourite
> hypothesis is that my omission of this dll or something simila
On Dec 17, 5:36 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> wrote:
> >Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
> >MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
> >based executable? (I assume I need just a matching pair of MSVCR90.DLL
> >and MSVCP90.DLL?)
>
> Either the o
wrote:
>Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
>MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
>based executable? (I assume I need just a matching pair of MSVCR90.DLL
>and MSVCP90.DLL?)
Either the one the came with your copy Microsoft Visual C++ or P
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:04:25 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> >> wrote:
> >> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
> >
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
>> wrote:
>> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
>
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
Are all packages availab
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> wrote:
> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
/W
--
INVALID? DE!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle wrote:
> Kee Nethery wrote:
>>
>> I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
>> my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x, I'm
>> moving up to 3.x.
>>
>> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:47 -0700, Kee Nethery wrote:
> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
> do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be to learn the
> language.
>
> People who have been coding in 2.x for along time don't notice how the
> syntax is won
I have just started using 2.6 (upgrade from 2.5). All my web
applications' code (using Django), work without any changes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kee Nethery wrote:
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x,
I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder tha
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping
through my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports
debugging in 3.x, I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be
Peng Yu wrote:
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the
On Sep 12, 4:10 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Peng Yu wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
> > code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
> > guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
> > versions. But
On Sep 12, 3:47 pm, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
> code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
> guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
> versions. But the code developed in newer ve
Peng Yu wrote:
Hi,
I just start python programming. That is, I don't have any legacy
code. I notice that there are different versions of python. I would
guess that older version of python has the more libraries than newer
versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
support
"W. eWatson" wrote:
>
>I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
>version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
Well, there's a subtle point that gives me an opportunity to point out a
lesser-known "feature" of the NT-based systems (XP, Vista,
Mike Driscoll wrote:
On Feb 19, 11:29 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
On Feb 19, 11:29 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> W. eWatson wrote:
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >> On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> >>> I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
> >>> version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
> >>> -
W. eWatson wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
W. eWatson
(121.01
[email protected] wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
W. eWatson
(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 De
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
> version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
> --
> W. eWatson
>
> (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std.
Eric,Fredrik,
Many thanks for your prompt advice, it was a 'better safe than sorry' type
of question.
Don
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Eric Wertman wrote:
The subprocess module is one though
footnote: subprocess works on older versions too, and can be trivially
installed along with your application under Python 2.2 and 2.3.
binary builds for Windows are available here:
http://effbot.org/downloads/#subprocess
--
http:
Don wrote:
I'm a reasonably experienced in other languages and have just decided to
get my feet wet with Python. But I'm using FC6 which has v2.4.4 installed,
is this good enough to start out with or am I likely to encounter bugs that
have been fixed in later versions.
Python 2.4 is definitely
> I'm a reasonably experienced in other languages and have just decided to
> get my feet wet with Python. But I'm using FC6 which has v2.4.4 installed,
> is this good enough to start out with or am I likely to encounter bugs that
> have been fixed in later versions.
I'm sure there will be other op
68 matches
Mail list logo
