> You could possibly make a case that before Queue.put blocks it should check
> whether the program has more than just the one thread and if not it should
> raise an RTFMException.
Cute :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
brad wrote:
> Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
>
>> Why did you put an upper bound to the queue?
>
> For clarity. Explicit is better than implicit, right? In our design, the
> queue should only have x number of things, so why not show that? Other
> than that, the limit is arbitrary and is not ne
brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Mellon wrote:
>
>> ... the producer is designed to block if
>> the queue is full. You can use the put_nowait method to have it raise
>> an exception instead of blocking.
>
> I assumed that the behavior would have been the other way around. I
> should not
brad wrote:
> url_queue = Queue.Queue(256)
> for subnet in subnets:
> url_queue.put(subnet)
>
> The problem is that I have 512 things to add to the queue, but my limit
> is half that... whoops. Shouldn't the interpreter tell me that I'm an
> idiot for trying to do this instead of just hangin
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
> Why did you put an upper bound to the queue?
For clarity. Explicit is better than implicit, right? In our design, the
queue should only have x number of things, so why not show that? Other
than that, the limit is arbitrary and is not needed.
--
http://mail.pyt
Chris Mellon wrote:
> ... the producer is designed to block if
> the queue is full. You can use the put_nowait method to have it raise
> an exception instead of blocking.
I assumed that the behavior would have been the other way around. I
should not have made that assumption.
--
http://mail.pyt
On 8/8/07, brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> url_queue = Queue.Queue(256)
> for subnet in subnets:
> url_queue.put(subnet)
>
> The problem is that I have 512 things to add to the queue, but my limit
> is half that... whoops. Shouldn't the interpreter tell me that I'm an
> idiot for trying to d
On Aug 8, 9:38 am, brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that I have 512 things to add to the queue, but my limit
> is half that... whoops. Shouldn't the interpreter tell me that I'm an
> idiot for trying to do this instead of just hanging? A message such as
> this would be more appropri
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:38:49 -0400, brad wrote:
> url_queue = Queue.Queue(256)
> for subnet in subnets:
> url_queue.put(subnet)
>
> The problem is that I have 512 things to add to the queue, but my limit
> is half that... whoops. Shouldn't the interpreter tell me that I'm an
> idiot for tr
