In article <[email protected]>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>Aahz a écrit :
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>>
>>> NB : answering the OP (original post didn't show up on c.l.py ???)
>>
>> Correct. There's a problem with
Aahz a écrit :
In article <[email protected]>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
NB : answering the OP (original post didn't show up on c.l.py ???)
Correct. There's a problem with the mail->news gateway, I think that
MIME messages are failing. I "fixed" the problem for c.l.py.
In article <[email protected]>,
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>NB : answering the OP (original post didn't show up on c.l.py ???)
Correct. There's a problem with the mail->news gateway, I think that
MIME messages are failing. I "fixed" the problem for c.l.py.announce by
maki
MRAB a écrit :
Wells Oliver wrote:
NB : answering the OP (original post didn't show up on c.l.py ???)
In writing out python classes, it seems the 'self' is optional,
You mean, inside a method ?
meaning that inside a class method,
In Python, a "class method" is a method that operates on
Wells Oliver wrote:
In writing out python classes, it seems the 'self' is optional, meaning
that inside a class method, "self.foo = bar" has the same effect as "foo
= bar". Is this right? If so, it seems a little odd- what's the rationale?
Or am I mistaken?
Inside a function or method "foo =
In writing out python classes, it seems the 'self' is optional, meaning that
inside a class method, "self.foo = bar" has the same effect as "foo = bar".
Is this right? If so, it seems a little odd- what's the rationale?
Or am I mistaken?
--
Wells Oliver
[email protected]
--
http://mail.python.o
