On 12/21/2025 11:54 AM, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 03:19, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2025-12-21 23:59:48 +1100, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 at 23:31, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
There is the concept of "pythonic" Code (just like ther
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 03:19, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2025-12-21 23:59:48 +1100, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 at 23:31, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > > There is the concept of "pythonic" Code (just like there is a concept of
> > > idiomatic code in (almost) any
On 2025-12-21 23:59:48 +1100, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 at 23:31, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > There is the concept of "pythonic" Code (just like there is a concept of
> > idiomatic code in (almost) any language), but if you ask 100 randomly
> > chosen Python progra
Op 18/12/2025 om 5:02 schreef c186282:
Oh, I usually write "i=i+2". It's a bit more
clear and becomes the same code anyway.
I'm going to disagree here. In my opinion i += 2 is more clear. It
avoids repeating the i, which makes it more immediately clear that the
operation only involves varia
On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 at 23:31, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> There is the concept of "pythonic" Code (just like there is a concept of
> idiomatic code in (almost) any language), but if you ask 100 randomly
> chosen Python programmers whether the use of += is pythonic, I doubt
> that more than a handful
On 2025-12-21 04:22:02 +, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 05:25:25 -0500, c186282 wrote:
>
> >Well, I kind of liked PICK system ... everything was equal, always
> >represented as a string. Numbers, chars, whatever - instantly/easily
> >converted between each other.
> >NO '
On 2025-12-21 04:25:26 +, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 10:12:49 +, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> > I would say that although Python does have some aspects of strong
> > typing, it is mostly weakly typed.
>
> Type hints sort of address that.
Type hints add static typing (and only for
On 2025-12-20 10:12:49 +, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Another property suggested in [1] for ‘strong typing’ is that functions
> can only be called with with arguments matching a declared type.
I would call that "static typing". I think it is useful to separate
these, especially for Python.
On 2025-12-18 04:25:35 -0500, c186282 wrote:
> On 12/18/25 01:54, rbowman wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 23:02:24 -0500, c186282 wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, I usually write "i=i+2". It's a bit more clear and becomes the
> > > same code anyway. += is more a 'C' thing.
> >
> > And Python, C#, Java
On 2025-12-18 18:00:45 +, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Peter Flass writes:
> > I comment *A LOT*. When I had to go back and revisit some very old
> > code, I wished I had commented more. I've almost never looked at a
> > program and said "I wish it had fewer comments."
>
> Regrettably, I’ve en
10 matches
Mail list logo
