> On 9 Mar 2023, at 00:37, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas
> wrote:
>
> Having had my last proposal shot down in flames, up I bob with another. 😁
See this discussion that has a nice solution proposed with the concat function.
Barry
> It seems to me that it would be useful to be able to make th
I think `'\n'.join(lines, 1)` & `'\n'.join(lines, 'e')` are worse than
`'\n'.join(lines,
at_end=True)` or others, it's much more complicated to understand what will
be produced.
Le ven. 10 mars 2023 à 00:47, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas <
[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
> On 09/03/2023 05:2
Then we're back to square one, doing this would be more confusing than
just adding the sep to the joined string. In my opinion, this proposal
just isn't needed. The equivalent solution is easier to understand and
to write, and will lead to way less confusion about what join()
actually does.
__
