Hello everyone. First time here, so please be forgiving of any missteps on my
part.
This is an idea I have thought about for a while, and I believe it could be
quite useful.
Would it be possible to enhance the standard range() type to allow for
elementary operations on ranges?
For example :
ra
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 13:50, wrote:
> Hello everyone. First time here, so please be forgiving of any missteps on
> my part.
> This is an idea I have thought about for a while, and I believe it could
> be quite useful.
> Would it be possible to enhance the standard range() type to allow for
> elem
> For cases where the number of elements in the range is not ridiculously
> large, simply converting to sets is probably sufficient:
>
Sets don’t preserve order, which may or may not be important— but as the IP
didn’t provide a use case, I have no idea.
To the OP: this idea isn’t likely y on be
Thanks so much Christopher. I have several ideas for use cases, but you're
right, it's probably better off as a library. That's exactly what I'll do now.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to python-idea
You're right, sets does make sense in these specific use cases, but I want to
preserve order too. You're also right, a custom class is a much better idea.
Thanks so much.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an em
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 13:50, wrote:
>
> Hello everyone. First time here, so please be forgiving of any missteps on my
> part.
> This is an idea I have thought about for a while, and I believe it could be
> quite useful.
> Would it be possible to enhance the standard range() type to allow for
>
