On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 02:22, Steve Jorgensen wrote:
> After some playing around, I figured out a pattern that works without any
> changes to the implementations of `dataclass` or `Enum`, and I like this
> because it keeps the 2 kinds of concern separate. Maybe I'll try submitting
> an MR to add a
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 03:54, Steve Jorgensen [email protected] wrote:
> > David Mertz, Ph.D. wrote:
> > I've seen this thread, and also wondered why anyone could EVER want a
> > dataclass that is an enum. Nothing I've seen in the thread gives me any
> > hint about that,
While confusion with optional arguments is somewhat unfortunate, the name came
from an already established convention. A lot of languages have exactly the
same concept, varying between names like Optional, Option, and Maybe. I don't
think coming up with a Python-specific name for the same thing
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022, 18:05 Steve Jorgensen, wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 03:54, Steve Jorgensen [email protected] wrote:
> > > David Mertz, Ph.D. wrote:
> > > I've seen this thread, and also wondered why anyone could EVER want a
> > > dataclass that is an enum. Not
Kevin Mills writes:
> While confusion with optional arguments is somewhat unfortunate,
> the name came from an already established convention. A lot of
> languages have exactly the same concept, varying between names like
> Optional, Option, and Maybe. I don't think coming up with a
> Python-
