I conclude my writing style has not helped soliciting responses.
I would appreciate them.
Summary - what I would like to say - is that there are platforms that
have been successful in applying PEP425's definitions of tagging Python
and modules.
Looking at the modules pip and wheel I can verify i
On Sep 1, 2019, at 13:04, Michael Felt wrote:
>
> I conclude my writing style has not helped soliciting responses.
>
> I would appreciate them.
Maybe you’re just asking in the wrong place? I think most discussions on issues
like this happen on distutils-sig or one of the more specific PyPA lis
Among other places, Python ideas was recommended as a place to goto.
In the meantime I have been discussing this on pypa/pip (mainly), and also on
wheel and packaging. Even submitted PRs. But the PRs are only needed if the tag
is inadequate.
So, part of my reason for being here is to figure o
> Don't say that this proposal won't be abused. Every one of the OP's
> motivating examples is an abuse of the syntax, returning non-strings
> from something that looks like a string.
If you strongly believe that if something looks like a string it ought to quack
like a string too, then we can
