I have originally planned to post the proposal on bpo, but things turned
out unexpectedly (for me), so I am returning here.
I wrote the patch (for the Python part). If anyone is interested it is here:
https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/master...risa2000:json_patch
The patch follows the ori
Hello,
I have a proposal to improve support of __main__.py (python -m foobar)
invocation to argparse.ArgumentParser
You can find attached a PEP draft.
Unfortunately, I'm not very confident on how to add that PEP and ...
honnestly not very used to github.
In short, can you help me and advise on
On Aug 23, 2019, at 00:33, Richard Musil wrote:
>
> Why simplejson remained separated from the main CPython is also a question (I
> guess there was/is a reason), because it seems like including the code
> completely and maintain it inside CPython could be better use of the
> resources.
The RE
There’s no need for this to be a PEP at this point. You only write those after
discussion on -ideas, once you have the ideas nailed down, answers to all of
the objections, all of the bikeshedding issues out in the open, and consensus
that the idea is ready for a final decision.
I’m not even sur
One more thing: from reading your proposal, it sounds like your actual issue
may be that you’ve got something you want to distribute to end-users who aren’t
Python experts to run as `python -m spam`, and the usage messages they get back
are confusing them?
If so, why not just use a setuptools e
Andrew, thanks for the background.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:25 AM Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, IIRC, it doesn’t do any post-check; it assumes calling str on any
> Decimal value (after an isfinite check if not allow_nan) produces valid
> JSON. I think
On Aug 23, 2019, at 09:45, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> Andrew, thanks for the background.
>
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:25 AM Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas
>> wrote:
>
>> Also, IIRC, it doesn’t do any post-check; it assumes calling str on any
>> Decimal value (after an isfinite check if
Thanks a lot for your comments Andrew,
I'm replying to your two emails using this, just to avoid confusions.
On the need of a PEP or a bug fix, well, I'm learning ;-) As I'm a good
student, I've written a draft PEP...
My idea was more a proposal to be discussed because wanting python -m
foobar i
Hello Michaël,
in your PEP your wrote:
---
The standard library's ``argparse.ArgumentParser`` uses by default
``sys.argv[0]`` for his ``prog`` property.
It means that when using the ``python -m foobar`` invocation, which calls
under
the hood the ``foobar.__main__`` module, the ``prog`` will be
``
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:54 PM Michael Hooreman
wrote:
> The issue is with package foobar containing __main__.py file (not with a
> module called as a script, which is your case), and called via python -m
> foobar
>
> See the last paragraph of https://docs.python.org/3/library/__main__.html
> :
Hi Richard,
The issue is with package foobar containing __main__.py file (not with a
module called as a script, which is your case), and called via python -m
foobar
See the last paragraph of https://docs.python.org/3/library/__main__.html :
«
For a package, the same effect can be achieved by inc
11 matches
Mail list logo
