Thanks David
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier, I made a bunch of releases of
makefun in the meantime. In particular I fixed a few bugs and added an
equivalent of `functools.partial` .
> One of the nice things in wrapt is that Dumpleton lets you use the same
> decorator for functions,
Hi Steven,
On 3/12/19 12:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I don't know who you expect is using this: the Python core developers
> responsible for adding new language features and changing the grammar,
> or Python programmers.
Python core devs should write the 'python_next' and 'is_python_code'
part
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:39 AM francismb wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 3/12/19 12:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > I don't know who you expect is using this: the Python core developers
> > responsible for adding new language features and changing the grammar,
> > or Python programmers.
> Python c
Hi Paul,
On 3/12/19 12:21 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> That sounds very similar to 2to3, which seemed like a good approach to
> the Python 2 to Python 3 transition, but fell into disuse because
> people who have to support multiple versions of Python in their code
> found it *far* easier to do so with
Hello,
I'd like to know if there is a basic HTML wrapper for Python, like
TextWrapper but allowing the generation of HTML from strings or iterables
of strings. Like:
make_select = HTMLWrapper(tag='select class="eggs"', indent=' ')
make_option = HTMLWrapper(tag='option')
Applying this like:
s =
Hi Vlad, and welcome!
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:00:03PM +0100, Vlad Tudorache wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to know if there is a basic HTML wrapper for Python, like
> TextWrapper but allowing the generation of HTML from strings or iterables
> of strings.
This list is for proposing and discussin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 09:33:21PM +0100, francismb wrote:
[...]
> > Do you mean something like 2to3? Something which transforms source code
> > written in Python?
> >
> Yes a source transformer, but to be applied to some 3.x version to move
> it to the next 3.x+1, and so on ... (instead of '2to3'
francismb writes:
> Trying to keep a single code base for 2/3 seems like a good idea
> (may be the developer just cannot change to 3 fast due how big the
> step was) but that also have the limitation on how far you can go
> using new features.
This doesn't work very well: you can't use 3 at a
Sylvain MARIE via Python-ideas writes:
> I totally understand your point of view. However on the other hand,
> many very popular open source projects out there have the opposite
> point of view and provide decorators that can seamlessly be used
> with and without arguments (pytest, attrs, clic
francismb wrote:
Yes a source transformer, but to be applied to some 3.x version to move
it to the next 3.x+1, and so on ... (instead of '2to3' a kind of
'nowtonext', aka 'python_next')
Couldn't that relax the tension on doing 'backward compatibility
changes' a bit ?
Not really. Having to tran
This is very much the kind of thing that would belong in a library.
There's probably more than one out there right now. In fact, way back when
I started learning Python (almost 20 yrs ago!)), there was such a lib -- I
think it was called HTMLgen. However, since then, most people have decided
that
Hello, Steven,
This wasn't a question asking for support. The answers I found when
searching were different from what I needed, that's why I'm using my own.
But I understand the point.
Regards,
Vlad
Le jeu. 14 mars 2019 à 23:43, Steven D'Aprano a
écrit :
> Hi Vlad, and welcome!
>
> On Thu, M
12 matches
Mail list logo