t of uses, but it should be an
external class. If it stays close in behavior to the lists' behavior,
then we could even add a notice in pop()'s documentation that
recommends to use your new class in case they want a painless way to
replace list usage (to make the life of those poor developers
think that GPL license allows money-making that BSD
type wouldn't allow. Hence the common point of view saying "BSD-type
is more commercial-friendly than GPL".
I've written an article last year that, while it doesn't address this
issue specifically, it touches it.
htt
busy, he won't have time for this. So your best bet for this
fix to be checked in is to add a test, but even then, sometimes, patches fade
into oblivion and you might have to regularly "freshen" your diff to match with
the trunk so it applies cleanly.
Virgil Dupras
f a patch being created very much.
Maybe you can point to a google code project for which starring is used
intensively and to observably good results?
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
roundup/meta/
The mailing list about the tracker is:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
As for the "mailing list/patch" proposal, I think you should drop it. It's been
made abundantly clear, by people much more knowledgable about the dev process
of Python than
On 2/18/08, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Don't now if always, or in the last few months where I've been
> following the issues more closely, but I found that are appearing a
> lot of small RFEs in the tracker.
>
> These normally are small but not trivial things. In most case
On 2/18/08, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 11:11 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> > > -On [20080218 13:38], Virgil Dupras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >P
On 2/18/08, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appreciate the desire to "keep the issue tracker clean", but I think
> human intelligence needs to be applied to the task, not just a
> date-based cutoff.
Personally, the bug count doesn't bother me. I was just responding to
Brett's concerns
On 2/18/08, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure we should be throwing RFE's away with such casual abandon
> just because nobody had time to pay them any attention in six months -
> nor bugs neither, come to that.
Well, we have to evaluate the chances of our older tickets to come
On 2/19/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, we have to evaluate the chances of our older tickets to come to
> > completion. I'm of the opinion that ticket getting older have very
> > small chances of ever being completed. RFE for python 2.4 are likely
> > to be irrelevant.
>
On 2/19/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, I don't, which is why I would find it interesting to run some
> > queries on the roundup database to have completion statistics for low
> > activity tickets. Is is possible to get a copy of that db somehow?
>
> I would rather not make
On 2/19/08, Virgil Dupras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> closed_status = db.status.lookup('chatting')
Oops, replace 'chatting' with 'closed'
Virgil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail
On 2/21/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - no selection -118
> wont fix189
> works for me62
> accepted310
> fixed 611
> duplicate 75
> later 17
> invalid 73
> postponed 6
> out of date 193
> remind 1
> rejected18
Hi devs,
Being a python dev newbie, I look in http://www.python.org/dev/ for
some guide to write unit tests in python and I can't find any.
Specifically, I'd like to know about files managements in tests. Is
every test expected to clean after itself, or is there an automatic
cleanup mechanism in p
On 2/21/08, Virgil Dupras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Being a python dev newbie, I look in http://www.python.org/dev/ for
> some guide to write unit tests in python and I can't find any.
> Specifically, I'd like to know about files managements in t
On 2/21/08, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virgil Dupras wrote:
> > On 2/21/08, Virgil Dupras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> Being a python dev newbie, I look in http://www.python.org/dev/ for
> >> some
On 2/21/08, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the result for the "open" status issues? I guess not, because
> the rejected, fixed, etc, should be closed.
>
> Could you run this again, please, but filtering by "open" tickets?
I don't see why would want to run this query on open
On 2/23/08, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have over 1,700 open issues - bug reports, feature requests and
> patches - in our bug tracker. In my humble opinion it's a sure sign for
> a problem.
There is also 12000 closed tickets, with 1200 of them having been
closed in the last
er have_unicode
is relevant or not, is it more appropriate to create a ticket for it
or to ask python-dev?
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.pyt
d somewhere else, I searched
for an answer but I couldn't find it.
Additionally, one thing that strikes me as strange is how hard it is
to find a "Migration guide" on the website. I had to dig in the PEP
3000 to find the brief bullet list telli
7;s about time I try to
learn reST...
Virgil Dupras
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I would also like to point out that I submitted a patch related to
that a couple of months ago in:
http://bugs.python.org/issue839159
But it never got any attention :( I'm not sure if it is still relevant.
Virgil
On 13-Sep-08, at 10:20 PM, Armin Ronacher wrote:
Hi everybody,
In Python
On 06 Dec 2008, at 20:38, Warren DeLano wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:22:38 -0800
From: Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "as" keyword woes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm still in the dark as to what type of data could
even inspire the
us
On 2011-08-27, at 2:20 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:48, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> No, this was not the intent of __future__. The intent is that a
> feature is desirable but also backwards incompatible (e.g. introduce
24 matches
Mail list logo
