On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> What are the characteristics of your machine? We already have several
> Linux x86/x86-64 buildbots... That said, we could also toy with other
> build options if someone has a request about that.
It is not very unique. It is Intel x86 (32 b
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Daily code coverage builds would be nice, but that's probably beyond
> what the current infrastructure can offer. It would be nice if someone
> wants to investigate that.
Code coverage buildbots would indeed be good. I could give a try on
t
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> Please fix the markup: no blank line, but indented. E.g.
>
> .. versionchanged:: 3.3
>Blah, blah.
Done. Sorry for that, I only built the docs and saw if the directive
was affected and assumed it okay.
Fixed that.
Thanks,
Senthil
__
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Thomas Heller wrote:
> Will there be more 2.7 bugfix releases, and when the next one?
>
> In other words; if I submit a patch and it is accepted, can I
> expect that patch be committed also to the 2.7 branch?
>
>
We are still back-porting bug fixes to 2.7 branch.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
> On 8/18/2012 11:47 AM, MRAB wrote:
>
> I vote -0. The issue can also be addressed with a small and simple
> helper function that wraps urlparse and compares the query parameter. Or
> you cann urlencode() with `sorted(qs.items)` instead of
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> +1 for 3.4
>
> You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
> in the stdlib? It's the next step after HTTP 1.1.
Yeah, it is a good idea. it should live along side with HTTP 1.1 as
another protocol layer.
Guido
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Chances are the problem won't be very annoying in practice, but just
> FYI.
I dont get this. I see 2.7 as a separate un-merged branch again (
http://hg.python.org/cpython/graph). Just curious, what happened next?
Thanks,
Senthil
Yes, this is question is for python-li...@python.org
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Elli Lola wrote:
> $ ./python -m test -v test_urlwithfrag
Where did you get this command from? It looks to me to me that more than
one person is trying the exact same command experiencing the same failure
(exp
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> My question is: would you accept to break backward compatibility (in
> Python 3.4) to fix a potential security vulnerability?
>
> If not, an alternative is to add an option, disabled by default, to
> enable (or disable) explicitly close-on-ex
And this is not just with Python. Try any other dynamic language
(Ruby), send a function in place of a string and see failure msg. And
if the question is really about path joins and path manipulations,
then I believe PEP 428 ( http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0428/)
would be better candidate to
201 - 210 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
