On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Michael Foord
>> wrote:
>>> On 11/02/2010 12:30, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Michael Foord wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, wrote:
> On 02:41 pm, ole...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Michael Foord
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/02/2010 12:30, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Michael Foord wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what response I expect from this email, and neit
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ben Finney
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Foord writes:
>>>
>>>> I've used unittest
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Michael Foord
> wrote:
>> The next 'big' change to unittest will (may?) be the introduction of class
>> and module level setUp and tearDown. This was discussed on Python-ideas and
>> Guido supported them.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 19:00, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>
>> Sorry. I had not finished the previous message
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Olemis Lang wrot
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:23 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Sure. Package management tool should have an ability to update itself when
>> required regardless of Python release. For example::
>>
>> python.exe -m easy_install setuptools
>>
>
> This should be:
>
> python -m easy_install -U setup
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> The open question is: do we want to include a full installer that
>> takes care of installing / removing dependencies as well ?
>>
>> I think not. Pip already provides this feature on the
Hello !
Often I have the contents to be written in a file at a given path that
I know as well. I recently tried to find a function in stdlib to do
that and to my surprise this is what I found :
- Such function exists
- It's `distutils.file_util.write_file`
IMO the last place where people'd l
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> a similar function in
>> e.g. shutils module ?
>
> A: Yes :)
>
> Basically, anything useful in distutils.file_util and
> distutils.dir_util can maove in Shutil.
> That's why I added make_archive (and unpack_archive)
>
> Please add an issue, I
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Vinay Sajip
>> wrote:
>>> Comments welcome. Assuming there are no strong objections asking for
>>> reversion
>>> of this change, I'll publicise to th
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 02:28 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
>>I've just checked in a change to logging into the py3k branch (r85835),
>>including doc changes and tests, for providing slightly more flexibility in
>>alternative format styles for logging
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Olemis Lang gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Barry Warsaw python.org> wrote:
>> > I haven't played with it yet, but do you think it makes sense to add a
>> > 'styl
Hello... this is my first post to this list and...
I would like to introduce myself by proposing a module for inclusion
(hopefully in a "near future") among the standard libraries (modules)
offered by Python (of course the idea is to present it here, promote
the debate and if "we all like it", wel
> >
> > > The goal
> > > should be to produce something like a unittest-ng, distribute it via
> > > the Cheeseshop, and gather consensus around it for possible inclusion
> > > in Python 2.7/3.1.
> > >
> >
IMO test support in Python needs some enhancements. I also think there
are great libraries av
>
> Abstract
>
>
> This PEP proposes frequently-requested additions to the standard
> library `unittest` module that are natural extensions of its existing
> functionality.
>
I had not seen this proposal... I will post a few comments.
>
> Motivation
> ==
>
> T
2008/9/7, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not necessarily - as you say, it's undocumented (and will remain so);
> in any case, I have now granted anonymous read access to that
> repository, through https.
>
Thnx a lot... Formerly I could not access anything because of the
aforementione
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
