s/.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly.
Thank you very much, and happy coding!
Jacob Kaplan-Moss
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, David Stanek wrote:
> Where is the code for PyPi? I took a quick look and didn't turn up anything.
https://svn.python.org/packages/trunk/pypi/
I've already started on a patch to make comments an option that
package maintainers could turn on or off, but I don't w
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Yeah, but you're not exactly an average user. Most users don't know
> how to use a bug tracker.
But they do know how to use mailing lists. Or IRC chats. Or support forums.
Those places have (for many projects) tens, hundreds, or even
tho
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I'm just not willing to submit to one side; hence the poll.
Nobody's asking you to "submit" to anything! We're asking for the
control to decide ourselves.
Look, there's already a large faction of people who just want to write
off PyPI a
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:41 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Because I want to wait for the outcome of the poll first.
I'm curious: what criteria will you use to judge the outcome of the
poll? That is, how will you translate the results of the poll into
action? Right now, the results stand as
All
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> By the way, there's no way for me to vote that I don't care what
> option ends up being chosen, but I strongly oppose choosing something
> that would tend to make developers avoid using PyPI.
I think the damage has already been done. There are
Hey folks --
Can someone point me to some information on what's going on with PEP
381 (PyPI mirroring)? There's a bunch of XXX'd material, and it
doesn't appear that pypi.python.org implements the statistics or
providing parts.
I'd be willing -- happy, actually -- to fill in the missing pieces,
b
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> This is so profoundly wrong on so many levels it is hard to know how to
> respond.
C'mon, Raymond, that's not any more helpful.
Geremy wasn't trying to argue for that course of action; he was
expression his frustration with the culture
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> Fundamentally; I would gladly hold up 3.2 (just my opinion) for the
> needed fixes to the standard lib [...]
I think I should share a little anecdote at this point:
Earlier in the year I worked for a while on Django/Py3. It's actually
not t
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> My goal (personally) is to make sure python 3.2 is perfectly good for use in
> web applications, and is therefore a much more interesting porting target for
> web projects/libraries and frameworks.
To try (again) to make things concrete her
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 16 September 2010 07:16, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>> I'm not working to get Django running on Python 3.1 because I don't
>>> feel confident I'll be able to put any apps I write into production.
>>
>> Why not? Since the I/O speed problem is fixed,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
> After all, even if PEP 333 is ultimately replaced by PEP 444, it's probably
> a good idea to have *some* sort of WSGI 1-ish thing available on Python 3,
> with bytes/unicode and other matters settled.
Indeed.
Though I generally like the directi
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> What I did say in the post you responded to is "Any programmer who sorts (or
> uses functions that depend on proper sorting) should know and respect the
> difference between partial orders, such as set inclusion, and total orders,
> such as lex
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> If you don't want a specific party snooping the site, just block that
> specific party. Why make a walled garden that *nobody* outside can look
> into? That undermines the free exchange of information.
I think the point is that most people aren
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Gustavo Narea wrote:
>> May I suggest that you adopt a policy for handling security issues like
>> Django's?
>> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/internals/contributing/#reporting-security-issues
>
> When t
15 matches
Mail list logo
