Re: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda

2006-02-07 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/7/06, Michael Urman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/6/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I think that a deferred object would help with one of > > lambda's biggest uses and made its loss totally reasonable. > > The ambiguity inher

Re: [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?

2006-02-07 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/7/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/7/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > what's the current release plan for Python 2.5, btw? I cannot find a > > > relevant PEP, and the "what's new" says "late 2005": > > > > > but I don't think that anyone followed up o

Re: [Python-Dev] Old Style Classes Goiung in Py3K

2006-02-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/8/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fuzzyman wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I understand that old style classes are slated to disappear in Python 3000. > > > > Does this mean that the following will be a syntax error : > > > > class Something: > > pass > > > > *or* that instead

Re: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda

2006-02-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/8/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:07 AM 2/8/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >On 2/8/06, Patrick Collison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And to think that people thought that keeping "lambda", but changing > > > the name, would avoid all the heated discussion... :-

Re: [Python-Dev] Help on choosing a PEP to volunteer on it : 308, 328 or 343

2006-02-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/8/06, Joao Macaiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. I'm interested in doing an undergraduate project under some Python > core PEP. > > I'm newbie to Python core. Program in C/C++. > > I've downloaded the sources with svn and now I'm studying it. > > > There are 3 PEP accepted : > > . 308 : Con

Re: [Python-Dev] Help on choosing a PEP to volunteer on it : 308, 328 or 343

2006-02-08 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/8/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:39:34PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > > On 2/8/06, Joao Macaiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 1. For a newbie in the Python core development, what is the best PEP to > > >

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP for adding an sq_index slot so that any object, a or b, can be used in X[a:b] notation

2006-02-09 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/9/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guido seemed accepting to this idea about 9 months ago when I spoke to > him. I finally got around to writing up the PEP. I'd really like to > get this into Python 2.5 if possible. > > -Travis > > > > > PEP: ### > Title: Allowing any ob

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP for adding an sq_index slot so that any object, a or b, can be used in X[a:b] notation

2006-02-09 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/9/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/9/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >2) Change the ISINT macro in ceval.c to accomodate objects with the > > >index slot defined. > > > > Maybe the macro sh

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP for adding an sq_index slot so that any object, a or b, can be used in X[a:b] notation

2006-02-09 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/9/06, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 11:30 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > In the past, the protocol for aqcuiring a PEP number has been to ask > > the PEP coordinators (Barry Warsaw and David Goodger) to assign one. I > > believe that we could simplify th

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP for adding an sq_index slot so that any object, a or b, can be used in X[a:b] notation

2006-02-09 Thread Brett Cannon
Looks good to me. Only change I might make is mention why __int__ doesn't work sooner (such as in the rationale). Otherwise +1 from me. -Brett On 2/9/06, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Attached is an updated PEP for 357. I think the index concept is better > situated in the

Re: [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?

2006-02-10 Thread Brett Cannon
On 2/10/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/7/06, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/7/06, Jeremy Hylton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It looks like we need a Python 2.5 Release Schedule PEP. > > > > Very draft: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0356.html > > > > Ne

Re: [Python-Dev] this is what happens if you freeze all the modules required for startup

2014-04-16 Thread Dr. Brett Cannon
, April 16, 2014 2:57:35 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 4/16/2014 12:25 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > Am 14.04.14 23:51, schrieb Brett Cannon: > >> It was realized during PyCon that since we are freezing importlib we > >> could now consider freezing all the

Re: [Python-Dev] devguide: Add note about Kushal Das' privs

2014-04-18 Thread Dr. Brett Cannon
On Friday, April 18, 2014 3:10:54 PM, Zachary Ware < zachary.ware+py...@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Brett Cannon gmail.com > wrote: > On Friday, April 18, 2014 2:35:32 PM, Benjamin Peterson > @ > python.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014, at

Re: [Python-Dev] devguide: Add myself to developer log and as a Windows expert.

2014-05-17 Thread Dr. Brett Cannon
I don't think you meant me for helping to build Windows binaries. :) On Sunday, May 11, 2014 9:58:16 AM, Steve Dower wrote: Thanks. For those who missed the earlier discussions, Martin v. Löwis has handed over responsibility for the Windows installers. It sounds like Brett Cannon and

<    29   30   31   32   33   34