Hello all.
It occurs to me that creating threads in Python is more awkward than it needs
to be. Every time I want to start a new thread, I end up writing the same thing
over and over again:
def target(*args, **kwds):
...
t = threading.Thread(target = target, args = , kwargs= )
t.start()
Th
> 1. Does t = target(...) start the thread? I think it does.
I think it does too. In the commonest use case, immediately after creating a
thread, you start it. And if you want to delay the thread but still use the
decorator, then you can do that explicitly with some locks. In fact, it’s
probably
It seems like the consensus is that this is a good idea, but it’s the wrong
good idea. Should I cancel the PR or should we try to make it into a better
good idea?
Cheers,
Barney.
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send
