Re: [Python-Dev] VM imaging based launch optimizations for CPython?

2008-12-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
rshalling but this part that actually costs performance, this efficient marshalling algorithm won't help. It would be interesting to find out which modules have a particularly high startup cost - perhaps they can be rewritten. Regards, Martin ___ P

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
aused by a bad malloc implementation. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.6.1 documentation not available for download

2008-12-21 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I've made documentation for 2.6.1 now. It's at > http://www.python.org/ftp/python/doc/2.6.1 In previous releases (back to 1.2), these files had version numbers in them. It would be good if those could be added for the more recent documentation sets as well.

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-21 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ld > benefit (performance wise) from not freeing arenas automatically. Before such a mechanism is added, I'd like to establish for a fact that this is an actual problem. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mai

Re: [Python-Dev] 2.6.1 documentation not available for download

2008-12-21 Thread Martin v. Löwis
e, it would be good if the release process created version-numbered files. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python

[Python-Dev] Releasing 2.5.4

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
It seems r67740 shouldn't have been committed. Since this is a severe regression, I think I'll have to revert it, and release 2.5.4 with just that change. Unless I hear otherwise, I would release Python 2.5.4 (without a release candidate) tomorrow. Regar

Re: [Python-Dev] Releasing 2.5.4

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Should we add this to the active branches (2.6, trunk, py3k, 3.0)? Sure! Go ahead. For 2.5.3, I'd rather not add an additional test case, but merely revert the patch. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Or perhaps there's a smarter way to manage the list of > arena/free pool info. If that code is the real problem (in a reproducible test case), then this approach is the only acceptable solution. Disabling long-running code is not acceptable. Rega

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
returned to the OS. Going back to the state of Python 2.4 would not be acceptable. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
pool will have moved). Regards, Martin a) usable_arenas becomes an arena_object**, pointing to an array of maxarenas+1 arena*. A second variable max_usable_arenas is added. arena_object loses the prevarena pointer, and gains a usable_index value of type size_t (which is 0 for unused

Re: [Python-Dev] Hello everyone + little question around Cpython/stackless

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
r and operating system separately. CPython has so far avoided using assembler code, and is fairly portable. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://ma

Re: [Python-Dev] If I check something in ...

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ommit-something-press-tab Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
so it should be possible to link it with a separate main() function, and nothing else of Python. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Releasing 2.5.4

2008-12-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
7;t want to find myself reverting your patch two weeks from now. Is the approach that you add a clearerr call is added for each read operation? Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi

Re: [Python-Dev] Problems compiling 2.6.1 on Solaris 10

2008-12-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
t it (as you have already ruled out the other options, such as using gcc, or not using ctypes). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/o

[Python-Dev] [ANN] Python 2.5.4 (final)

2008-12-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
2.5.4, including download links for various platforms, release notes, and known issues, please see: http://www.python.org/2.5.4 Highlights of the previous major Python releases are available from the Python 2.5 page, at http://www.python.org/2.5/highlights.html Enjoy this release, Martin Mar

Re: [Python-Dev] extremely slow exit for program having huge (45G) dict (python 2.5.2)

2008-12-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
; of the system. It also makes sure that you don't mess with the > regular heap and fragment it. While I'd like to see this done myself, I believe it is independent from the problem at hand. Contributions are welcome. Regards, Martin ___ P

Re: [Python-Dev] [ANN] Python 2.5.4 (final)

2008-12-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
; the original URL now also works as well (as it does for all other releases). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] VM imaging based launch optimizations for CPython?

2008-12-26 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ons here. This doesn't sound like any heavy computation is being done during startup. > Nokia has just released Python 2.5 based PyS60. I think we'll come back > this after a while with a nice generic profiler which will tell the > import cost. Looking forward to hear your nu

Re: [Python-Dev] A wart which should have been repaired in 3.0?

2008-12-28 Thread Martin v. Löwis
lit('/') for f in p]) ['', 'usr'] Of course, using it that way would require a library function that reliably splits a path into components; I think one would have to do abspath on arbitrary inputs. Regards, Martin ___ Py

Re: [Python-Dev] A wart which should have been repaired in 3.0?

2008-12-28 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Martin> I don't think any change is necessary. os.path.commonprefix > Martin> works just fine on path components: > ... > > Ummm... > > >>> os.path.commonprefix(["/export/home", "/etc/passwd"]) > '/e&

Re: [Python-Dev] Commands for correctly merging to the python 3.0 maintenance branch

2008-12-30 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> svn revert . > svnmerge -M -F [are you sure you don't need a command for svnmerge here?] Instead of these two, I always do svn resolved . Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailm

Re: [Python-Dev] A wart which should have been repaired in 3.0?

2009-01-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
I propose a different solution to this commonprefix mess: eliminate the function altogether. It is apparently too confusing to get right. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python

Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3 - Mac Installer?

2009-01-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
t; > +1 -1. I think it is a good choice that build-install.py is written in Python 2.x, and only relies on the system Python. For that matter, it could have been a shell script. That way, you don't have to build Python first in order to build it. Regards, Martin ___

Re: [Python-Dev] PyOS_GetLastModificationTime

2009-01-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Any suggestions how to deal with that issue? Correct me if I'm wrong: it seems that the function isn't called anymore. So I propose to just remove it (and the file it lives in). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@py

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
rently: I thought Victor's complaint is that some of his patches stay uncommitted for a long time. Victor wants to commit small changes without review. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] Bytes for the command line, process arguments and environment variables

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I don't have new solutions, it's just an email to restart the discussion > about > bytes ;-) Martin also asked for a PEP to change the posix module API to > support bytes. And I repeat this request: we don't need new discussions; we need a draft specification. Rest

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
are many other people who commit only to specific files, or only specific kinds of changes; see Misc/developers.txt for a (possibly incomplete) list. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailma

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
rying out one of them for this project] We can setup such a branch, unless you reconsider and try bazaar first. There wouldn't be any pushing it back upstream, though - you would still need to go through the tracker for all changes. The only advantage I can see is that it simplifies r

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
has a convenient way to generate a patch (even from multiple DVCS commits). I think that's what (git) people call "feature branch": a branch with the sole purpose of developing a single patch. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Py

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
r git extremely steep. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
installation of the committer, rather than from the contributor, as the committer is supposed to have his autoprops set correctly. I do think that "svn diff" will record property changes, and that may include svn:executable. I don't know which patch tool would inter

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 1:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> [I don't want to get into another DVCS flamewar, but I just >> can't let this go uncommented :-] > > I am sorry if that sounded like a flamewar, that was not my in

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
se. > 1/ is better for the flow, but the quality of the doc might suffer > from it if Georg (or others) doesn't have time to review it This is of little concern. As long as the documentation continues to build (into html), nearly all documentation changes

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Out of curiosity : is there any mechanism in the post-commit that > checks if "make html" > doesn't spit any error ? No, there is no such mechanism. There are daily builds which will report errors eventually. Regards, Martin __

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
stuck in political debates, so that we still can't use subversion 1.5 on the server. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ly helped in fixing these problems (applause to AMK for being very helpful with the most recent incidents). I'd rather have the users annoyed than finding out that the custom setup opened an entrance for hackers. Regards, Martin ___ Pytho

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
able has *bzr 0.11*). Since lenny was frozen, bzr managed to release 5 minor versions (so it is 1.10 now); this makes me very worried whether this software is mature. IOW, Python shouldn't require a VCS that is not even a year old (a year ago, bzr 1.1 was released). Regards, Martin _

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
abilities to > give the rights anymore beyond Barry, Martin, and Neal). [I don't think Barry actually can/does provide these privileges] I'd like to point out that there is a separation between the management privilege, and the technical implementation. Neal, Georg, and I do add commit

Re: [Python-Dev] Infra issues

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
t all possible. Regards, Martin P.S. I might have left out important activities. Please do let me know in private which these are - I might honestly not know, or forgotten how much day-to-day work they actually cost. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Py

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ualify. Whether mercurial is mature, and for how long it had been, I don't know. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] I would like an svn account

2009-01-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
hanged since their first release and updates have been more about bug > fixes and speed improvements. Speed improvements we can ignore; for bug fixes, it would be good to know how much one can go back without hitting a serious bug (e.g. one that might break the repository). Regards, Martin _

Re: [Python-Dev] How to configure with icc on Mac?

2009-01-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
without_gcc=$withval;; > > It ignores the CC value on the command line. I don't think it is a bug. --without-gcc *overrides* the CC environment variable, rather than ignoring it. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@

Re: [Python-Dev] How to configure with icc on Mac?

2009-01-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
cc choses to invoke ld(1) with an option -lgcc_s, and apparently, ld(1) can't find the library. Why icc choses to do so, and why ld(1) can't find it, I don't know - this is a question to ask on Macintosh or icc mailing lists. > Martin> I don't think it is a bug.

Re: [Python-Dev] How to configure with icc on Mac?

2009-01-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
en | 2006-04-29 13:31:35 +0200 (Sa, 29. Apr 2006) | 2 lines Patch 1471883: --enable-universalsdk on Mac OS X I think the intention is that the binaries built work on OSX 10.3 and later, hence OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET is set to 10.3. Regards, Martin ___

Re: [Python-Dev] How to configure with icc on Mac?

2009-01-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Perhaps --without-gcc should be removed, if it's both useless and misleading? > (note: I don't have an interest in the matter) I had the same thought. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.py

Re: [Python-Dev] Wrong buildbot page for 3.x-stable

2009-01-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Isn't the latter supposed to point to the py3k branch buildbots? Thanks for pointing that out - it is fixed now. Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscrib

Re: [Python-Dev] Roundup version numbers

2009-01-05 Thread Martin v. Löwis
targeted at newer versions: certainly not: Many issues were for old versions, and have long been closed. For the open issues, such retargetting would have to go along with a check whether the issue still exists in the newer versions. Regards, Martin _

Re: [Python-Dev] a few strdup() questions...

2009-01-07 Thread Martin v. Löwis
t accept NULL as valid input, e.g. the > glibc > implementation doesn't either and GCC even warns you if you call > strdup(NULL). Secondly, I would have used memcpy(), since the length is > already known and then potentially quicker. Should I write a patch? Is th

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 on linux under wine

2009-01-08 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> i'd just ... much rather be completely independent of proprietary > software when it comes to building free software. I guess my question is then: why do you want to use Windows in the first place? Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing

Re: [Python-Dev] error in doc for fcntl module

2009-01-08 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Is there any reason not to change this? Apart from the effort it makes to talk about it, and to review and apply the patch? No. Regards, Martin P.S. You really do need to trust that the system calls get forwarded by Python to the system as-is, with no additional trickery. If there

Re: [Python-Dev] Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS and GetLastError()

2009-01-10 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ld restrict the > conditionally compiled code further. That sounds like an unrelated issue to the one at hand. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mai

Re: [Python-Dev] How should I handle unsupported features?

2009-01-11 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Not sure what will break if Python can't even successfully set a SIGINT handler. b) cheat on setsig, not actually recording the signal handler. Not sure whether any code relies on getsig(k, setsig(k, f)) == f Regards, Martin (*) This is a general advise. If some feature is not sup

Re: [Python-Dev] __long__ method still exists in Python 3.x

2009-01-11 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ases)? There are, apparently, still callers of the nb_long slot, so I would be cautious. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p

Re: [Python-Dev] [Pydotorg] Python 3.0 Porting information

2009-01-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
x27;m not sure how useful this is (if the "upstream" package supports 3.0, and is listed in PyPI, then the PyPI listing is better. This page might help to collect "forking ports", i.e. where the porter is not the author). Regards, Martin

Re: [Python-Dev] Add Py_off_t and related APIs?

2009-01-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
gt; support makes off_t 64 bits wide) For argument parsing, you should use "long long" if SIZEOF_OFF_T is 8 and long long is supported, and then assign to off_t as appropriate. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python

Re: [Python-Dev] Add Py_off_t and related APIs?

2009-01-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
enefit from it? If we start with that, we end up with ParseTuple formats for uid_t, gid_t, pid_t, and the other dozen integral types that POSIX has invented. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/

Re: [Python-Dev] Add Py_off_t and related APIs?

2009-01-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
the valud into the (say) uid variable. However, it's still then fairly tricky: is uid_t a signed type or an unsigned type; if unsigned, can I still have negative values (which, for uid_t, I often can), does the platform have uid_t in the first place, and, if not, what other type should

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
lation. We need to understand what is happening first before trying to fix it. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
in, it is a bug in the system or the installation takes a second. There should be no timeout, but an immediate error. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Uns

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
stem specific; sshd as included in Debian has the same bug. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ck) Anything added to the event log? Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ck, yet. There is the TcpMaxConnectRetransmissions parameter, but this supposed affects requests without responses (and supposed also starts of with 3s) Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-d

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Yet another "undefined" thing affecting us, Martin. I think it's just another case of "Microsoft says it's undefined, even though the standards clearly specify what the behavior must be, and Microsoft managed to implement the behavior that not only violates the s

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
the server "misbehaves", the client has to suffer. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow

2009-01-15 Thread Martin v. Löwis
retry counter can't be changed, I'd suggest that they provide a socket option. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: [Python-Dev] Support for the Haiku OS

2009-01-15 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I don't see such a commitment in this case, but if a > believable one comes up I'm sure Martin would happily revert his > position. Indeed. I have myself added support for AtheOS, even though I had never used the system. The AtheOS maintainer ran away, the code rotted, and ev

Re: [Python-Dev] Problems with unicode_literals

2009-01-17 Thread Martin v. Löwis
= args[0] > > Should this be fixed, or wait for 2.7? It would be a new feature. So if we apply a strict policy, it can't be added to 2.6. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis

Re: [Python-Dev] Problems with unicode_literals

2009-01-17 Thread Martin v. Löwis
f a non-ASCII byte string (e.g. from the command line) happens to be compared with the option name (although I just now couldn't produce such a case). Regards, Martin P.S. optparse already defines a function isbasestring; it might be better to use that one instead. ___

Re: [Python-Dev] Python 3 for Mac OSX

2009-01-17 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Are we talking about days? weeks? Or, should I start learning how to > build Python from source? Any info would be appreciated. The latter. Don't ever expect that others will help you. This is open source; you have to help yourself. Rega

Re: [Python-Dev] No email about buildbot failures for 3.1?

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
tched off at all. I don't know what's happening. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] No email about buildbot failures for 3.1?

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ure that anything changed at all. Buildbot sent a failure message for the 3.0 branch as late as today: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2009-January/077320.html Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.p

Re: [Python-Dev] Strategies for debugging buildbot failures?

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
h. > What do others do to debug these failures? In the past, for the really difficult problems, we arranged to have the developers get access to the buildbot slaves. Feel free to contact the owner of the slave if you want that; let me know if I should introduce you. Regards, Martin

Re: [Python-Dev] Single Sign-On for *.python.org

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> So, the question is - > should we open a ticket for Single Sign-On system for *.python.org or > it bugs only me? Submission of tickets is futile. Code talks. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.p

[Python-Dev] Help! Vista symlinks and IDLE

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
symlinks. It would be good if anybody who has access to such a system can diagnose what the specific problem is, how to reproduce it on a system that has the English version of Vista installed, and preferably, how to solve the problem. Regards, Martin

Re: [Python-Dev] No email about buildbot failures for 3.1?

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> All I know is that I checked in a test that failed on all > case-sensitive file system for py3k (3.1) and there does not appear to > be a single email about it. And the buildbots very clearly had the > chance to fail. What is the specific checkin? What specific builds failed? Reg

Re: [Python-Dev] No email about buildbot failures for 3.1?

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
all builds). However, this has been the configuration since buildbot was first installed, so its not a recent configuration change. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Uns

Re: [Python-Dev] Single Sign-On for *.python.org

2009-01-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I've also had fruitless discussions about adding OpenID authentication > to Roundup. Did you offer patches to roundup during these discussions? Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailm

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-20 Thread Martin v. Löwis
i'm missing something, would be a simple matter, yes? Not exactly sure what this is, but I believe Python *already* includes such a thing. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-21 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> sorry, martin - i thought the win32 builds generated python25.lib, > python25.dll Correct. > and python25.def No. > so as to fit into the 8.3 filename convention. No. It generates python25.lib because that's the import library for python25.dll. It calls it python25.dl

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-21 Thread Martin v. Löwis
g. numpy for use with a mingw32-msys-built version of > python? I can't comment on that, because I don't know what your port does. Does it not produce a .dll containing the majority of Python? And is that not called python25.dll? Regards, Martin

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
takes off, we get another binary-incompatible Python version. I hope that users will understand that it is disjoint from the python.org version (as they seem to understand fine for the Cygwin build, which already picks up its extension modules also from a disjoint location, which helps to keep the two

Re: [Python-Dev] Single Sign-On for *.python.org

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I do not know alternative OpenID implementation for Python, so the > only way I see to continue development is to fork the lib. PyPI reports 15 packages when you search for OpenID. Not sure whether any of these are any good. Regards,

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
. > * http://python-mingw.donbennett.org/ This doesn't seem to be distributing binaries. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/optio

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
e the same either way. (of course, msvcr80 is irrelevant, because Python had never been using that officially) Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://ma

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
t; > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=182839 Where *exactly* do you get binaries there? All I can find is patches-2.5.1v2.gz Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-22 Thread Martin v. Löwis
cially) > > oh? i saw the PCbuild8 and thought it was. oh that's even better - > if python2.5 only officially support msvcrt whew. No, Python 2.5 is linked with msvcr71.dll. PCbuild8 was never officially used. > ok , i see - pytho

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
k at PCbuild/pythoncore.vcproj. It says Version="7.10" This is how you know VS 2003 was used to build Python 2.5, which in turn links in msvcr71.dll. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] compiling python2.5 (msys+mingw+wine) - giving up using msvcr80 assemblies for now

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
teroperability wrt. (third-party) extension modules. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Should ftplib use UTF-8 instead of latin-1 encoding?

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
server supports UTF8. One would have to go back to the original FTP RFC, but it seams that, in the absence of server UTF8 support, all path names must be 7-bit clean (which means that ASCII should be the default encoding). In any case, Brett changed the encoding to latin1 in r58378,

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
is the PEP author who makes all choices (considering suggestions from the community, of course). So what DVCS do the PEP authors recommend? Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> import random > print(random.choice('svn', 'bzr', 'hg', 'git')) Nice! So it's bzr, as my machine just told me (after adding the square brackets). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list P

Re: [Python-Dev] Update on MS Windows CE port

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ft off (with some of the code having rot). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
up for discussion (and if so, what it is that should be discussed). It seems that it's not the case, so I just sit back and wait until its ready. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailm

Re: [Python-Dev] Should ftplib use UTF-8 instead of latin-1 encoding?

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
upload. Then it can certainly know what encoding the file names have on disk. It *could* also support operation on pre-existing files, e.g. by providing a configuration directive telling the encoding of the file names, or by ignoring all file names that are not encoded in UTF-

Re: [Python-Dev] Should ftplib use UTF-8 instead of latin-1 encoding?

2009-01-23 Thread Martin v. Löwis
ot support RFC 2640, the client must restrict itself to 7-bit file names (i.e. ASCII). If the client violates the protocol, the server must respond with error 501. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mail

Re: [Python-Dev] ac_sys_system == Monterey*?

2009-01-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
led in 2000, although parts of it were integrated into AIX 5L. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40m

Re: [Python-Dev] Change Makefile.pre.in based on configure?

2009-01-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> How do I work around this difference in Makefile.pre.in? To answer this question, I would have to see the exact fragment that you want to see in the Solaris case, and the exact fragment that you want to have in the OSX case. Can you provide these? Regards, Mar

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST

2009-01-24 Thread Martin v. Löwis
e years, then reconsider" - not because none of the DVCS is a clear winner, but because there is too much resistance to DVCSes in general, at the moment. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailma

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST

2009-01-25 Thread Martin v. Löwis
n on those committers who see a DVCS as a burden). It would also put a burden on contributors who are uncomfortable with using a DVCS. Regards, Martin (*) I'm probably missing something, but ISTM that committers can already use the DVCS - they only need to create a patch just before committing.

<    35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >