status receiver to support separate summary pages for separate
projects and trunks... all with the same buildbot master server.
python.org/dev/buildbot/python/...
python.org/dev/buildbot/python-release24-maint/...
python.org/dev/buildbot
ind incremental builds so I'm not
sure what they are doing.
To wipe out the build occassionally you could (presumably) add a
starting step to the Python 'builder' (in the build master.cfg) to
rm -rf $builddir
every, say, Sunday
self, *args, **kwargs)
python_factory = factory.GNUAutoconf(
s(SVNEx, svnurl="http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk";,
mode="update_and_clobber_occassionally"),
test=["make", "test"], # use `make testall
[Martin v. Loewis wrote]
> Trent Mick wrote:
> > I think I'm part of the way there with the following. I've subclassed
> > the "SVN" source build step to add support for new source mode:
> > "update_and_clobber_occassionally". Basically it (hackil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote]
> ...and whoever the Tcl/Tk master is these days (still Ousterhout?)...
That's Jeff Hobbs. He sits behind me. I'll see if I can pester him to
give some Tcl/Tk and _tkinter thoughts.
Cheers,
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EM
a step ("make check_for_missing_docs"?). That probably would be
fairly straightforward. Neil and Martin would probably know better. I
don't have access to the buildbot setup.
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
P
the raised exception's args; (2) the ability to test that the
stringified exception matches a given regular expression; and (3)
much better failure messages.
I haven't read this thread, so apologies is this doesn't really apply to
the discussion.
Cheers,
Trent
--
T
alog.command)
> which would simplify a bunch of code in process/factory.py since it is
> called this way 10 times. Didn't look elsewhere.
Add a buildbot patch/bug?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=73177&atid=537003
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED
> also create multiple Waterfall instances, each with a different
> set of "categories", and use that to manage the complexity of
> displaying status for lots of Builders. (with the current release
> these multiple Waterfalls must all listen on different TCP
st a matter of nice-ing the slave process at startup?
As (I think) Brian mentioned, the scheduler for the (proposed) "full
builder" could be setup to just build, say, once per day or only a couple
of times per day where as the "incremental builder" would trigger for
every SVN che
> > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
>
> in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
python/Doc/tools/something?
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-De
[Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote]
> And BTW, what does splitunc do?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Universal_Naming_Convention
> It really should have a more descriptive name.
No more that should "urllib" or "splitext".
Trent
--
T
[Nick Coghlan wrote]
> What if we used "subpath" as the name instead of joinpath?
"append"?
not-a-big-fan-of-joinpath-either-ly yours,
Trent
--
Trent Mick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
