On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Victor Stinner wrote:
>
>> I'm still developing irregulary my sandbox project since last june.
>
>> Today, the biggest problem is the creation of a read only view of the
>> __builtins__ dictionary.
>
> Why do you think you need to do this? What
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 3:45 AM, cool-RR wrote:
> I think that if someone calls `__enter__` directly, he takes the
> responsibility of calling `__exit__`, so we don't really have to help him
> with `__del__`.
> But other than that I understand the motivation for making it start on
> `__init__` ra
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> We are nearly ready to launch the new blog for python-dev.
>
> Cool. But I always thought planet.python.org was a kind of blog for
> python-dev. How will python-dev blog be different? Will add additional
> redundancy
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> You mean that the test run keeps the test instances alive for the whole test
> run so instance attributes are also kept alive. How would you solve this -
> by having calling a TestSuite (which is how a test run is executed) remove
> members fr
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 20:18, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Foord
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean that the test run keeps the test instances alive for the whole
>>> t
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On the one hand we have the 'bytes are ascii data' type interface, and on
>> the other we have the 'bytes are a list of integers between 0 - 256'
>> interface.
>
> No. Bytes are a list o
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Robert Collins writes:
>
> > Its probably too late to change, but please don't try to argue that
> > its correct: the continued confusion of folk running into this is
> > evidence that confusion
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Either that or fix the error message. I can't find much benefit in
> accepting None, that said (nor in refusing it).
Its very convenient when working with slices to not have to special
case the end points. +1 on accepting None, FWIW.
-Rob
_
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> >From what I understand, the biggest motivation for pure Python
>> versions is cooperation with the other Python implementations. See
>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0399/
>
> Apologies, I didn't remember it was written down in PEP.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lib/packaging is in the repository history, and in my backup clones, but
> it’s not visible in any branch head as we have no branch for 3.4 yet. I
> can bring the directory back with a simple Mercurial command.
>
> However, it’s not cl
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 07:12:47PM -0400, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> > python3 perf.py -T --basedir ../benchmarks -f -b py3k
>> ../cpython/builds/2.7-wide/bin/python ../cpython/builds/3.3/bin/python3.3
>
>> ### call_method ###
>> Min: 0.491433
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
