[Python-Dev] PEP 649: Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations

I'd like to revive the discussion of PEP 649 [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0649/] that started shortly before development of 3.10 features was closed. This is Larry's PEP to defer evaluation of __annotations__ until it's actually accessed. During the discussion the decision was made to b

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 649: Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations

Some prior discussions: "PEP 563 in light of PEP 649": https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZBJ7MD6CSGM6LZAOTET7GXAVBZB7O77O/ "In support of PEP 649": https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/7VMJWFGHVXDSRQFHMXVJKDDOVT47B54T/ "PEP 56

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 646 (Variadic Generics): final call for comments

I'd be interested in using this the mechanisms defined in this PEP to define rank-generic Tensor types in TensorFlow, which are important in specifying `tf.function` signatures in a Pythonic way, using type annotations (rather than the custom `input_signature` mechanism we have today - see this

[Python-Dev] Re: Windows buildbots may be broken

It is really nice post. https://bit.ly/3fsxwwl ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail

[Python-Dev] Re: Windows buildbots may be broken

Sorry, all! This post was pure spam - I clicked the wrong button on the moderator UI. The list has already been set to auto-reject any future posts from this member. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:51 AM ridhimaortiz--- via Python-Dev wrote: > > It is really nice post. https://bit.ly/3fsxwwl >

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 649: Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:31 AM Eric V. Smith wrote: > I'd like to revive the discussion of PEP 649 > [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0649/] that started shortly before > development of 3.10 features was closed. This is Larry's PEP to defer > evaluation of __annotations__ until it's actually

[Python-Dev] New __main__.rst

There have been a series of requests to enhance the current __main__.rst document : bpo-17359 bpo-24632 bpo-39452 So, I rewrote it! I wen

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 649: Deferred Evaluation Of Annotations

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:30 AM Eric V. Smith wrote: > > Personally, I'd like to see PEP 649 accepted. There are a number of > issues on bpo where people expect dataclass's field.type to be an actual > Python object representing a type, and not a string. This field is > copied directly from __ann