[Python-Dev] Re: enum in the stable ABI (Was: PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals)

On 24. 07. 21 1:58, Nick Coghlan wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, 9:37 am Larry Hastings, > wrote: On 7/23/21 7:38 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote: (In both C & C++, the size of an `enum` is implementation-defined. That's unlikely to be a problem in practice, but

[Python-Dev] Re: Comments on PEP 558

(I'm not sure Mailman will get the threading right when I've received the original email directly, so apologies in advance if this reply creates a 2nd thread) On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 23:57, Mark Shannon wrote: > > Hi, > > First of all let me say that I agree with the aims of PEP 558 and most > of t

[Python-Dev] Re: Comments on PEP 558

Hi Nick, On 27/07/2021 2:29 pm, Nick Coghlan wrote: (I'm not sure Mailman will get the threading right when I've received the original email directly, so apologies in advance if this reply creates a 2nd thread) On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 23:57, Mark Shannon wrote: Hi, First of all let me say tha

[Python-Dev] Re: Comments on PEP 558

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, 1:50 am Mark Shannon, wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On 27/07/2021 2:29 pm, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > > > > The reference documentation should be precise as well, since that is > > what other implementations will be following. > > > > What semantics do you feel are left unspecified? >

[Python-Dev] [IMPORTANT] [Release communication] Python 3.10.0rc1 next week: get ready!

Hi everyone, This is a friendly reminder from the release management team that the first release candidate of Python 3.10 is next Monday. Now is a fantastic time you make sure that: ## If you are a user or library developer * If you filed a bug for something not working in any of the betas for 3