On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:46 AM Tim Peters wrote:
>
> > At last, all size classes has1~3 used/cached memory blocks.
>
> No doubt part of it, but hard to believe it's most of it. If the loop
> count above really is 10240, then there's only about 80K worth of
> pointers in the final `buf`.
You are
Hi,
the table with auditing events does not render on docs.python.org,
https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
going to present the auditing feature tomorrow at EuroPython. It would
be helpful to have the table available.
It works on Steve's and my local machine wit
Hi Christian,
> the table with auditing events does not render on docs.python.org,
> https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
> going to present the auditing feature tomorrow at EuroPython. It would
> be helpful to have the table available.
This was not an easy one..
When passing **kwargs to a callable, the expectation is that kwargs is a
dict with string keys. The interpreter enforces that it's a dict, but it
does NOT check the types of the keys. It's currently the job of the
called function to check that. In some cases, this check is not applied:
>>> fro
On 2019-07-09 14:36, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
So this leads to the question: should the interpreter check the keys of
a **kwargs dict?
Some pointers:
- https://bugs.python.org/issue8419
- https://bugs.python.org/issue29360
___
Python-Dev mailing list --
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:29 PM Inada Naoki wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:46 AM Tim Peters wrote:
> >
> >> I was more intrigued by your first (speed) comparison:
> >
> > > - spectral_norm: 202 ms +- 5 ms -> 176 ms +- 3 ms: 1.15x faster (-13%)
> >
> > Now _that's_ interesting ;-) Looks like
On 09/07/2019 14.02, Julien Palard wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>> the table with auditing events does not render on docs.python.org,
>> https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
>> going to present the auditing feature tomorrow at EuroPython. It would
>> be helpful to hav
[python-dev -> Bcc]
There are questions to answer, but they are mostly of a pretty mundane
kind. Technical issues are deflected by the auto-response, which contains
many pointers to sources of possible assistance, and so can usually be
disregarded or followed up with a simple response underlining
On 7/9/2019 8:50 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2019-07-09 14:36, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
So this leads to the question: should the interpreter check the keys of
a **kwargs dict?
Some pointers:
- https://bugs.python.org/issue8419
- https://bugs.python.org/issue29360
It was also discussed last Oc
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:34 PM Julien Palard via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> > the table with auditing events does not render on docs.python.org,
> > https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
> > going to present the auditing feature
Thanks for the pointer, but that's more about allowing strings which are
not valid identifiers. I'm talking about passing non-strings and more
specifically about the C protocol. For Python functions, non-string
keyword arguments are already disallowed, but that's because of the
implementation o
Thinking about this, I don't believe allowing non-string keys here are a
desirable feature.
It's tempting not to check for this in some cases where it does no harm
(skipping the check shaves a few microseconds off execution time), but I
think the reference manual should require strings here and we
[Inada Naoki ,
looking into why mimalloc did so much better on spectral_norm]
> I compared "perf" output of mimalloc and pymalloc, and I succeeded to
> optimize pymalloc!
>
> $ ./python bm_spectral_norm.py --compare-to ./python-master
> python-master: . 199 ms +- 1 ms
> python:
On 7/9/2019 6:44 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Hi,
the table with auditing events does not render on docs.python.org,
https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
going to present the auditing feature tomorrow at EuroPython. It would
be helpful to have the table available
On 7/9/2019 3:53 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/audit_events.html. Steve and I are
going to present the auditing feature tomorrow at EuroPython.
That should be interesting. My experiment with the following
>>> def audit(event, args): print(event, args)
>>> import
On 2019-07-09, Inada Naoki wrote:
> So I tried to use LIKELY/UNLIKELY macro to teach compiler hot part.
> But I need to use
> "static inline" for pymalloc_alloc and pymalloc_free yet [1].
I think LIKELY/UNLIKELY is not helpful if you compile with LTO/PGO
enabled. So, I would try that first. Also
16 matches
Mail list logo
