On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There's a PR to the peps proposal here:
> https://github.com/python/peps/pull/242
>
> The full text of the current proposal is below. The motivation for this is
> that for complex decorators, even if the type checker can figure out what's
>
On 15 May 2017 at 10:48, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
> > Here's the proposed text (wordsmithing suggestions in the PR please):
> >
> > +Decorators
> > +--
> > +
> > +Decorators can modify the types of the functions or classes they
> > +decorate. Use the ``decorated_type`` decorator to declare
Thanks for the clarification. I'm glad we can keep hash randomization
disabled during our builds.
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Don't worry, the PYTHONHASHSEED setting does not get recorded in the
> bytecode header and the generated bytecode (even if it sometimes dif
